
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
|
|
Jan 26 Pm Wednesday Eve Session January 26, 2011 Scores after 6 rounds Average: 36.0 Section E Pair Pct Score Rank MPs 1 47.92 34.50 Jim Ciolli - Thomas Ciolli 2 46.56 33.52 Jackie Mullin - Martha Berner 3 56.93 40.99 2 0.56 Trish Lane - Cheryl Rankin 4 40.99 29.51 Fred Nimtz - Betty Birmingham 5 40.75 29.34 Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter 6 52.32 37.67 Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura 7 61.08 43.98 1 0.80 Robert Shapley - Elaine Chan 8 53.46 38.49 3 0.40 Lois Richards - Richard Keplinger |
EW 7♣; EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 5♥; EW 3♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
520 3.00 0.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
990 2.00 1.00 3-Lane-Rankin vs 7-Shapley-Chan
1020 0.50 2.50 2-Mullin-Berner vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
1020 0.50 2.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 6♦; NS 5♥; NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 3♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.00 0.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
200 1.00 2.00 2-Mullin-Berner vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
200 1.00 2.00 3-Lane-Rankin vs 7-Shapley-Chan
200 1.00 2.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 6♠; NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 3♦; NS 3♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 2.50 0.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
480 2.50 0.50 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
450 1.00 2.00 3-Lane-Rankin vs 7-Shapley-Chan
430 0.00 3.00 2-Mullin-Berner vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; NS 3♥; NS 2♣; NS 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 0.00 2-Mullin-Berner vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
500 1.50 1.50 3-Lane-Rankin vs 7-Shapley-Chan
500 1.50 1.50 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
680 0.00 3.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♥; NS 4N; NS 5♦; NS 2♠; NS 3♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
690 1.50 1.50 3-Lane-Rankin vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
690 1.50 1.50 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
690 1.50 1.50 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 7-Shapley-Chan
690 1.50 1.50 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 2-Mullin-Berner
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6N; EW 6♥; EW 6♦; NS 2♠; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 0.00 3-Lane-Rankin vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
1430 2.00 1.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 2-Mullin-Berner
1440 1.00 2.00 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
1460 0.00 3.00 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 7-Shapley-Chan
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♦; EW 5♥; E 5♣; W 4♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.00 0.00 3-Lane-Rankin vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
1440 1.00 2.00 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
1440 1.00 2.00 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 7-Shapley-Chan
1440 1.00 2.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 2-Mullin-Berner
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 6♣; NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 1♠; NS 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1100 3.00 0.00 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 7-Shapley-Chan
480 2.00 1.00 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
450 1.00 2.00 3-Lane-Rankin vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
140 0.00 3.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 2-Mullin-Berner
| ||||||||||||||||||
S 2N; NS 3♣; N 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; S 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 2.83 0.17 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 3-Lane-Rankin
150 1.50 1.50 7-Shapley-Chan vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
50 0.17 2.83 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.83 0.17 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 3-Lane-Rankin
100 1.50 1.50 7-Shapley-Chan vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
630 0.17 2.83 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 5♦; W 2N; NS 2♠; E 1N; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.83 0.17 7-Shapley-Chan vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
450 1.50 1.50 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
500 0.17 2.83 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 3-Lane-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♥; NS 2♠; EW 3♣; EW 1N |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.83 0.17 7-Shapley-Chan vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
420 0.83 2.17 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
420 0.83 2.17 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 3-Lane-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♥; EW 3♠; EW 2N; NS 3♣; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.00 0.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
200 1.50 1.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Mullin-Berner
200 1.50 1.50 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Lane-Rankin
100 0.00 3.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Shapley-Chan
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♥; NS 4N; NS 3♠; NS 4♦; NS 3♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 2.50 0.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Mullin-Berner
450 2.50 0.50 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Lane-Rankin
430 1.00 2.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
420 0.00 3.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Shapley-Chan
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 3.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Mullin-Berner
120 1.50 1.50 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Lane-Rankin
120 1.50 1.50 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
400 0.00 3.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Shapley-Chan
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6♠; EW 6♣; EW 5N; N 1♥; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 3.00 0.00 5-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Shapley-Chan
650 1.50 1.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Mullin-Berner
650 1.50 1.50 6-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Lane-Rankin
680 0.00 3.00 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 2N; NS 2♠; N 2♦; NS 2♣; NS 1♥; S 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 2.83 0.17 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
180 1.50 1.50 7-Shapley-Chan vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
50 0.17 2.83 2-Mullin-Berner vs 3-Lane-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; EW 4♦; NS 2♠; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.83 0.17 7-Shapley-Chan vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
100 1.50 1.50 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
420 0.17 2.83 2-Mullin-Berner vs 3-Lane-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4N; EW 3♠; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; EW 3♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.17 0.83 7-Shapley-Chan vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
100 2.17 0.83 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
600 0.17 2.83 2-Mullin-Berner vs 3-Lane-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; EW 5♥; E 4N; EW 3♣; W 1N; E 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.83 0.17 7-Shapley-Chan vs 4-Nimtz-Birmingham
100 1.50 1.50 2-Mullin-Berner vs 3-Lane-Rankin
200 0.17 2.83 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 2N; NS 2♥; EW 3♦; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 2.83 0.17 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
100 0.83 2.17 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.83 2.17 7-Shapley-Chan vs 2-Mullin-Berner
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.83 0.17 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
140 0.83 2.17 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
140 0.83 2.17 7-Shapley-Chan vs 2-Mullin-Berner
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 5♦; W 2N; E 1N; NS 2♣; NS 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.83 0.17 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
170 0.83 2.17 7-Shapley-Chan vs 2-Mullin-Berner
170 0.83 2.17 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 1N; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.83 0.17 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
50 1.50 1.50 7-Shapley-Chan vs 2-Mullin-Berner
90 0.17 2.83 8-Richards-Keplinger vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 6N; NS 6♣; N 5♠; S 4♠; NS 4♥; NS 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
440 2.17 0.83 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Lane-Rankin
440 2.17 0.83 2-Mullin-Berner vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
50 0.17 2.83 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 5♣; NS 3♥; EW 2N; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 2.83 0.17 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
170 1.50 1.50 2-Mullin-Berner vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
620 0.17 2.83 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Lane-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♥; NS 3♦; NS 1N; EW 1♠ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 1.50 1.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Lane-Rankin
110 1.50 1.50 2-Mullin-Berner vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
110 1.50 1.50 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2♦; NS 2♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 2.83 0.17 2-Mullin-Berner vs 6-Bunch-Kitamura
90 1.50 1.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Lane-Rankin
100 0.17 2.83 4-Nimtz-Birmingham vs 5-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||