
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Monday Afternoon Pairs Monday Aft Session March 19, 2012
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 21.0 Section F
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
1 41.67 17.50 C Cathy Jasek - Sheila Forbes
2 45.24 19.00 C 2 0.14(C) Michelle Behan - Doris Wilson
3 50.00 21.00 B 3/4 3 0.27(A) Millie Gibbons - Jean Chene
4 50.00 21.00 A 3/4 0.27(A) Kathie Angione - Aimee Squires
5 67.86 28.50 B 1 1 0.64(A) Don Sandweiss - Liz Piazzoni
6 46.43 19.50 C 1 0.20(C) Dan Bloch - Liz Cogdill
7 38.10 16.00 C Rusty Etzel - Jenice Trailer
8 60.71 25.50 B 2 2 0.45(A) Linda MacKey - Ivan Harwood
NS 6♠; NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 5♦; S 4♣; N 3♣; Par +980
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 3 5 460 2.50 0.50 3-Gibbons-Chene vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
3 NT S ♣ 4 5 460 2.50 0.50 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
4 ♠ S ♦ 3 5 450 1.00 2.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
3 NT N ♦ 10 4 430 0.00 3.00 2-Behan-Wilson vs 4-Angione-Squires
| |||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♥; EW 2N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −420
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ W ♠ A 4 170 2.50 0.50 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
3 ♥ W ♠ A 4 170 2.50 0.50 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
3 ♥ W ♠ 4 5 200 1.00 2.00 2-Behan-Wilson vs 4-Angione-Squires
4 ♥ E ♠ A 4 420 0.00 3.00 3-Gibbons-Chene vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
| |||||||||||||||||||
NS 2♥; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; EW 1N; NS 1♠; Par −100: NS 3♥x-1
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT W ♥ 2 -3 300 3.00 0.00 4-Angione-Squires vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
2 NT W ♥ 4 -1 100 2.00 1.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 2-Behan-Wilson
4 ♦ E ♥ A 4 130 1.00 2.00 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
3 NT W ♠ 10 3 600 0.00 3.00 3-Gibbons-Chene vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
| |||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 5♣; N 4♦; S 3♦; NS 1N; NS 1♥; Par +620
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT x W ♣ 6 -4 1100 3.00 0.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 2-Behan-Wilson
3 NT W ♠ A -3 300 2.00 1.00 3-Gibbons-Chene vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
2 ♠ N ♥ A 2 110 1.00 2.00 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
2 ♥ S ♥ 3 -2 200 0.00 3.00 4-Angione-Squires vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
| |||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 4♦; NS 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♣; Par −140
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT W ♣ 4 -2 100 3.00 0.00 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni vs 2-Behan-Wilson
3 ♠ E ♣ 3 -1 50 2.00 1.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
2 ♠ E ♣ 3 3 140 1.00 2.00 7-Etzel-Trailer vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
4 ♠ E ♦ A 4 420 0.00 3.00 4-Angione-Squires vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
| |||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 4N; E 4♦; W 3♦; EW 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −650
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ W ♠ 8 5 150 3.00 0.00 4-Angione-Squires vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
4 ♥ E ♣ K 5 650 1.50 1.50 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni vs 2-Behan-Wilson
4 ♥ E ♣ K 5 650 1.50 1.50 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
4 ♥ W ♠ Q 6 680 0.00 3.00 7-Etzel-Trailer vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
| |||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 3♥; EW 2N; E 2♣; EW 1♦; W 1♣; Par −620
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♣ A -3 300 3.00 0.00 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
4 ♠ E ♣ A -1 100 2.00 1.00 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
2 ♥ N ♣ 5 -3 300 0.50 2.50 1-Jasek-Forbes vs 2-Behan-Wilson
2 ♦ S ♣ 5 -3 300 0.50 2.50 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 4-Angione-Squires
| |||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♠; S 1♥; Par +100: EW 3♦x-1
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦ W ♠ 8 -3 150 3.00 0.00 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
2 ♠ E ♦ A -2 100 1.50 1.50 1-Jasek-Forbes vs 2-Behan-Wilson
4 ♠ E ♦ A -2 100 1.50 1.50 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 4-Angione-Squires
3 ♦ W ♠ 8 3 110 0.00 3.00 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
| |||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 4♦; EW 3♣; EW 1N; NS 1♥; Par −140
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♥ S ♦ A 2 110 3.00 0.00 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
2 ♠ E ♥ 3 -1 100 2.00 1.00 7-Etzel-Trailer vs 4-Angione-Squires
1 NT E ♥ 7 2 120 1.00 2.00 2-Behan-Wilson vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
2 ♠ E ♣ 3 3 140 0.00 3.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
| |||||||||||||||||||
W 3♠; E 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ E ♦ 3 -2 200 3.00 0.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
3 ♥ N ♠ A 3 140 2.00 1.00 2-Behan-Wilson vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
Pass Pass 1.00 2.00 6-Bloch-Cogdill vs 1-Jasek-Forbes
4 ♥ x S ♠ 10 -2 500 0.00 3.00 7-Etzel-Trailer vs 4-Angione-Squires
| |||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 3♦; EW 1♠; Par +100: EW 4♥x-1
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♦ J -2 100 3.00 0.00 3-Gibbons-Chene vs 4-Angione-Squires
3 ♥ E ♦ J -1 50 2.00 1.00 7-Etzel-Trailer vs 2-Behan-Wilson
1 ♠ E ♣ A 2 110 1.00 2.00 1-Jasek-Forbes vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
4 ♥ E ♦ J 4 420 0.00 3.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
| |||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♥; NS 5♣; NS 2♦; Par +620
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 7 3 600 3.00 0.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
1 NT N ♥ 10 6 240 2.00 1.00 3-Gibbons-Chene vs 4-Angione-Squires
3 ♥ S ♣ 9 5 200 1.00 2.00 1-Jasek-Forbes vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
3 NT N ♠ 4 -4 400 0.00 3.00 7-Etzel-Trailer vs 2-Behan-Wilson
| |||||||||||||||||||
NS 6N; N 6♠; S 5♠; NS 5♦; N 5♣; S 4♣; NS 2♥; Par +1440
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 NT N ♥ 5 6 1440 3.00 0.00 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
3 NT N ♥ 7 7 720 2.00 1.00 2-Behan-Wilson vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
3 ♠ S ♥ 6 5 200 1.00 2.00 1-Jasek-Forbes vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
4 ♠ S ♦ 8 -1 100 0.00 3.00 4-Angione-Squires vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
| |||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; W 1♣; Par −140
|
CONTRACT LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ W ♦ 6 -2 100 2.50 0.50 2-Behan-Wilson vs 6-Bloch-Cogdill
2 ♠ W ♣ 2 -2 100 2.50 0.50 8-MacKey-Harwood vs 7-Etzel-Trailer
1 NT W ♦ 6 2 120 1.00 2.00 4-Angione-Squires vs 5-Sandweiss-Piazzoni
3 NT W ♣ A 4 430 0.00 3.00 1-Jasek-Forbes vs 3-Gibbons-Chene
| |||||||||||||||||||
| ? by ? |
| ? by ? |