To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Monday Afternoon Pairs Monday Aft Session February 18, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 15.0 Section A
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
2 60.00 18.00 B 1 1 0.36(A) Carol Eklund - Lu Bucknell
1 48.33 14.50 B 2 2 0.25(A) Vickie Palmer - Darrel Palmer
5 46.67 14.00 C 1 0.15(C) Liz Cogdill - Laraine Havel
3 40.00 12.00 C Ellie Elphick - Karen Kukuk
6 40.00 12.00 C LaRu DeKock - Thomas Wilson
4 65.00 19.50 A NE John Lagodimos - Kathie Angione
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
8 7 6
♥
10 4 2
♦
K 7 6 4
♣
A 7 4
♠
K Q J 9 5 3
♥
A 9 5 3
♦
8
♣
9 6
N
W
E
S
♠
—
♥
J 8 7 6
♦
A Q 9 3
♣
Q J 10 5 2
7 10 10 13
♠
A 10 4 2
♥
K Q
♦
J 10 5 2
♣
K 8 3
EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♦; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ E ♥ Q −1 50 1.50 0.50 4-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
4 ♠ W ♦ K −1 50 1.50 0.50 5-Cogdill-Havel vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
2 ♠ S ♦ 8 −2 100 0.00 2.00 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
J 10 8
♥
10 8 6 3
♦
K 6
♣
9 6 4 3
♠
Q 7 6 2
♥
7 4 2
♦
Q 10 5
♣
Q J 2
N
W
E
S
♠
4
♥
K J 9 5
♦
A J 8 4 3
♣
A 10 7
4 7 13 16
♠
A K 9 5 3
♥
A Q
♦
9 7 2
♣
K 8 5
S 2♠; EW 3♦; EW 1N; N 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♠ S ♠ 6 2 110 1.50 0.50 5-Cogdill-Havel vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
2 ♠ S ♦ 5 2 110 1.50 0.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
1 NT W ♠ J −1 50 0.00 2.00 4-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
A 10 9 7 4
♥
K 6
♦
K 6 5
♣
Q 7 2
♠
K Q 8 2
♥
Q J 4 3 2
♦
Q J 9
♣
A
N
W
E
S
♠
—
♥
A 8
♦
A 10 8 7 4 3 2
♣
6 5 4 3
12 15 8 5
♠
J 6 5 3
♥
10 9 7 5
♦
—
♣
K J 10 9 8
EW 6♦; EW 4N; EW 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 1♣; Par −800: NS 6♠×−4
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦ E ♠ 7 −2 200 1.50 0.50 4-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
5 ♦× E ♠ J −1 200 1.50 0.50 5-Cogdill-Havel vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
3 ♠ N ♦ A −4 200 0.00 2.00 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
J 7 6 3
♥
K 10 6 3
♦
J 6
♣
10 7 2
♠
Q 10 8 5
♥
7 4
♦
A 10
♣
K Q 6 5 4
N
W
E
S
♠
—
♥
Q J 9 2
♦
K Q 8 7 4 2
♣
J 9 3
5 11 9 15
♠
A K 9 4 2
♥
A 8 5
♦
9 5 3
♣
A 8
EW 4♦; NS 2♠; E 3♣; EW 1N; W 2♣; NS 1♥; Par −130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♥ 4 −1 100 2.00 0.00 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
4 ♠ S ♦ A −2 200 0.50 1.50 4-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
3 ♠ S ♣ 5 −2 200 0.50 1.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
10 7 4
♥
6 5 4
♦
Q 7 3
♣
A K 10 2
♠
A Q J
♥
3
♦
A 10 8 4 2
♣
Q 8 5 4
N
W
E
S
♠
9 6 5
♥
A K
♦
K 9 6 5
♣
J 7 6 3
9 13 11 7
♠
K 8 3 2
♥
Q J 10 9 8 7 2
♦
J
♣
9
EW 4N; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 4♦; NS 1♥; Par −430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦× W ♣ A −1 100 2.00 0.00 4-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
3 ♥ S ♠ Q −1 100 0.50 1.50 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
3 ♥ S ♦ 4 −1 100 0.50 1.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
K Q 8 5 2
♥
J 8
♦
J 10 9 7 2
♣
3
♠
7 4
♥
K 10 7 3
♦
A K 8 4 3
♣
6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
10 6
♥
A Q 4
♦
6
♣
A K Q J 10 9 5
7 10 16 7
♠
A J 9 3
♥
9 6 5 2
♦
Q 5
♣
8 7 2
EW 5♥; EW 5♣; EW 2N; EW 2♦; NS 1♠; Par −650
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ S ♣ 3 −1 50 2.00 0.00 4-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
3 ♣ E ♠ A 5 150 1.00 1.00 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
5 ♣ E ♦ 5 6 620 0.00 2.00 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
A J 9 6
♥
A J 10 4 3 2
♦
6
♣
J 4
♠
10 8 7 4 3
♥
K 5
♦
K Q J
♣
A K Q
N
W
E
S
♠
K 2
♥
Q 9 8
♦
10 9 7 5 2
♣
8 6 2
11 18 5 6
♠
Q 5
♥
7 6
♦
A 8 4 3
♣
10 9 7 5 3
NS 2♥; EW 3♦; EW 1♠; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT W ♥ 4 −1 100 1.50 0.50 2-Eklund-Bucknell vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
2 NT W ♥ 10 −1 100 1.50 0.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
1 ♠ W ♥ 4 2 110 0.00 2.00 5-Cogdill-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
A Q J 10 4
♥
Q 8 7
♦
J 9 8 4
♣
3
♠
K 2
♥
J 10 4
♦
6
♣
A K Q J 9 6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
7 3
♥
A K 6 5 3 2
♦
Q 5 3
♣
8 5
10 14 9 7
♠
9 8 6 5
♥
9
♦
A K 10 7 2
♣
10 7 2
NS 5♠; NS 5♦; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; Par +300: EW 6♣×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣ W ♠ Q 5 400 1.50 0.50 2-Eklund-Bucknell vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
5 ♣ W ♠ Q 5 400 1.50 0.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
4 ♥ E ♦ A 5 450 0.00 2.00 5-Cogdill-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
7 3
♥
J 10
♦
J 10 7 3
♣
A 10 8 6 5
♠
10 6 5 2
♥
A 3 2
♦
A 9 5 4
♣
4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
J 9
♥
Q 7 4
♦
K 6 2
♣
K J 9 7 3
6 8 10 16
♠
A K Q 8 4
♥
K 9 8 6 5
♦
Q 8
♣
Q
NS 2♠; NS 2♥; NS 1N; N 1♦; E 1♣; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♦ A 3 140 2.00 0.00 5-Cogdill-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
1 ♠ N ♣ 4 −1 50 1.00 1.00 2-Eklund-Bucknell vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♠ N ♣ 2 −2 100 0.00 2.00 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 3-Elphick-Kukuk
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
A Q 6 2
♥
A Q J
♦
A 7
♣
A K 6 4
♠
J 10 9 7 4
♥
10 8 5 2
♦
K
♣
Q 8 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K 8 3
♥
7 6
♦
J 10 8 6 5
♣
J 5 2
24 6 5 5
♠
5
♥
K 9 4 3
♦
Q 9 4 3 2
♣
10 9 7
NS 6♣; NS 5♥; NS 4N; NS 4♦; NS 2♠; Par +1370
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT N ♦ J 3 150 2.00 0.00 2-Eklund-Bucknell vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
3 NT N ♦ 6 −1 100 0.50 1.50 3-Elphick-Kukuk vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT N ♦ J −1 100 0.50 1.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
A Q 4
♥
K Q 2
♦
A 8 4
♣
K J 10 6
♠
K J 10 8 6 5 3
♥
5
♦
K Q 10 3
♣
5
N
W
E
S
♠
7 2
♥
A 9 4 3
♦
9 6 5
♣
Q 9 8 2
19 9 6 6
♠
9
♥
J 10 8 7 6
♦
J 7 2
♣
A 7 4 3
NS 4N; NS 4♥; EW 3♠; NS 4♣; NS 2♦; Par +300: EW 5♠×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ S ♠ 8 2 110 2.00 0.00 2-Eklund-Bucknell vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
4 ♠× W ♥ K −1 100 1.00 1.00 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
3 ♠ W ♥ K 3 140 0.00 2.00 3-Elphick-Kukuk vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
A 4
♥
J 9 8 2
♦
Q 10 9 7
♣
7 4 3
♠
K 8 5
♥
A K Q 5
♦
J 8 5
♣
Q J 10
N
W
E
S
♠
J 9 7 6 2
♥
7 6 4
♦
A 6 3
♣
A K
7 16 12 5
♠
Q 10 3
♥
10 3
♦
K 4 2
♣
9 8 6 5 2
EW 4♠; EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 1♣; Par −420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ W ♦ 7 −2 100 2.00 0.00 3-Elphick-Kukuk vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♠ W ♦ 10 4 420 0.50 1.50 2-Eklund-Bucknell vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
4 ♠ W ♦ 7 4 420 0.50 1.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
6
♥
K 6 3
♦
9 8 6
♣
K Q 10 8 7 5
♠
A Q 9 8 7 3
♥
A 10 8
♦
K Q 4
♣
3
N
W
E
S
♠
K
♥
Q 9 4 2
♦
A J 10 7 5
♣
J 6 4
8 15 11 6
♠
J 10 5 4 2
♥
J 7 5
♦
3 2
♣
A 9 2
EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 5♦; EW 1N; NS 1♣; Par −620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠×× E ♣ K −2 1000 2.00 0.00 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
3 ♦ W ♣ A 3 110 1.00 1.00 3-Elphick-Kukuk vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
2 ♠ E ♣ K 3 140 0.00 2.00 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
J
♥
5 4 2
♦
A Q 9 8 6 3
♣
J 8 7
♠
A 8 5 2
♥
K 10 7 3
♦
J 10
♣
Q 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 7 6 4 3
♥
Q 9 8 6
♦
K
♣
10 6 2
8 10 7 15
♠
K 10 9
♥
A J
♦
7 5 4 2
♣
A K 9 5
NS 3N; NS 5♦; NS 4♣; EW 1♠; Par +400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ N 5 150 1.50 0.50 3-Elphick-Kukuk vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
3 ♦ N ♠ 4 5 150 1.50 0.50 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
3 ♠ E ♦ 2 −1 50 0.00 2.00 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
8 6 5 2
♥
K
♦
9 5
♣
A K J 8 5 4
♠
A K Q 7
♥
A Q 9 4
♦
K Q 8 6
♣
9
N
W
E
S
♠
J 10 4 3
♥
10 8 3
♦
A 7 4 3
♣
7 2
11 20 5 4
♠
9
♥
J 7 6 5 2
♦
J 10 2
♣
Q 10 6 3
EW 6♠; EW 6♦; EW 4♥; EW 1N; NS 2♣; Par −980
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ N ♦ A 3 110 2.00 0.00 6-DeKock-Wilson vs 5-Cogdill-Havel
5 ♦ W ♥ K 6 420 1.00 1.00 3-Elphick-Kukuk vs 2-Eklund-Bucknell
4 ♠ E ♥ 2 5 450 0.00 2.00 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Angione
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
