To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session February 20, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 25.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
5 62.50 31.25 B 1 1 0.60(A) Jim Ciolli - Hiroko Kitamura
1 55.50 27.75 C 2 2 1 0.42(A) Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
2 49.50 24.75 C Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
4 45.84 22.92 B Dan Bloch - Richard Keplinger
3 37.50 18.75 C Vickie Palmer - Darrel Palmer
6 48.50 24.25 A NE John Lagodimos - Kathie Angione
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
Q 8 7
♥
6
♦
K 9 7 5 4
♣
8 7 6 2
♠
10 9 4 3 2
♥
8 2
♦
2
♣
K J 9 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A J 6
♥
K J 9 4
♦
Q J 8 3
♣
A Q
5 4 18 13
♠
K 5
♥
A Q 10 7 5 3
♦
A 10 6
♣
10 5
EW 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♥; Par −100: NS 3♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♥ 7 −2 100 2.00 0.00 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
2 NT E ♥ 7 −1 50 1.00 1.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Rankin-Adair
3 ♥ S ♣ 4 −1 50 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
A Q 10 9 6
♥
K
♦
A 10 6
♣
Q J 7 3
♠
J 5 2
♥
9 2
♦
K Q J 9 8
♣
K 6 5
N
W
E
S
♠
7 3
♥
Q J 10 7 3
♦
7 5 3
♣
A 9 4
16 10 7 7
♠
K 8 4
♥
A 8 6 5 4
♦
4 2
♣
10 8 2
NS 4♠; NS 2N; NS 3♣; NS 1♥; Par +620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♥ Q 4 170 1.50 0.50 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♠ S ♥ Q 4 170 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♦ W ♥ K −1 50 0.00 2.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
10 8 7
♥
J 10 3
♦
A K 8 4
♣
A J 6
♠
K J 4
♥
K 8 2
♦
Q 7 3 2
♣
8 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
9 5
♥
6 5 4
♦
10 9 6 5
♣
10 9 7 4
13 9 0 18
♠
A Q 6 3 2
♥
A Q 9 7
♦
J
♣
K Q 3
S 5♠; S 5♥; N 4♠; N 4♥; NS 3N; NS 3♦; NS 3♣; Par +450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♥ 8 5 450 2.00 0.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Rankin-Adair
3 NT N ♣ 4 4 430 1.00 1.00 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
6 ♠ N ♥ 2 −2 100 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
A
♥
K 7 3
♦
Q 10 8 3 2
♣
A J 5 4
♠
J 2
♥
Q J 6
♦
A 6
♣
K 9 8 7 6 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 8 7 6 5 4
♥
10 2
♦
K 5 4
♣
3
14 11 5 10
♠
K 9 3
♥
A 9 8 5 4
♦
J 9 7
♣
Q 10
NS 4♥; NS 4♦; NS 2N; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; Par +620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ N ♠ J 4 620 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ E ♥ A −2 200 1.00 1.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Rankin-Adair
3 ♥ S ♠ 2 4 170 0.00 2.00 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
5 4 3
♥
K Q 10 7 6 5 4
♦
10 2
♣
8
♠
A 7 6 2
♥
8
♦
A 8 7
♣
A J 9 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q 9 8
♥
A 9 2
♦
J 5 3
♣
10 7 3
5 13 10 12
♠
J 10
♥
J 3
♦
K Q 9 6 4
♣
K Q 6 4
E 5♠; W 4♠; EW 4♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♥; Par −450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ N ♠ 8 −1 100 1.50 0.50 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♥ S ♠ 8 −1 100 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ E ♥ J 3 140 0.00 2.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
10 9
♥
10 9 7 5
♦
2
♣
Q J 9 6 5 4
♠
Q 5 4 3 2
♥
A Q 3 2
♦
J 8 3
♣
8
N
W
E
S
♠
A K 8
♥
K 4
♦
A 9 6 4
♣
A K 10 7
3 9 21 7
♠
J 7 6
♥
J 8 6
♦
K Q 10 7 5
♣
3 2
EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♥; E 5♦; W 4♦; EW 4♣; Par −1440
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♣ 3 5 650 2.00 0.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT W ♣ 3 6 690 1.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Rankin-Adair
3 NT E ♦ 5 7 720 0.00 2.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
A Q 8
♥
10 3
♦
K Q 10 3 2
♣
A 5 4
♠
9 6 4 2
♥
Q 6 5 4
♦
4
♣
K Q 6 3
N
W
E
S
♠
5 3
♥
A K 8
♦
A J 6 5
♣
10 9 8 7
15 7 12 6
♠
K J 10 7
♥
J 9 7 2
♦
9 8 7
♣
J 2
EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par −90
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♦ 5 −1 100 1.50 0.50 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
1 NT S ♦ 5 −1 100 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Rankin-Adair
3 NT N ♥ A −5 500 0.00 2.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
Q 10 5 2
♥
9 7 2
♦
A Q J 10 7 6
♣
—
♠
9 8 6 4 3
♥
10 6
♦
5
♣
Q 10 8 6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
A K J
♥
K 8 5 3
♦
4 3
♣
A K 7 2
9 2 18 11
♠
7
♥
A Q J 4
♦
K 9 8 2
♣
J 9 5 3
NS 6♦; NS 2♥; EW 3♣; W 1♠; Par +800: EW 7♣×−4
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣ E ♦ K −4 200 2.00 0.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♦ N ♣ A 5 150 1.00 1.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
2 ♠ E ♥ 7 −1 50 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 10 7 5 3
♥
8 6 5
♦
A 8
♣
10 9 5
♠
K 6 4 2
♥
Q 4
♦
K Q J 10 6
♣
K Q
N
W
E
S
♠
A 8
♥
K J 10 7
♦
5 4 2
♣
J 8 4 3
6 16 9 9
♠
J 9
♥
A 9 3 2
♦
9 7 3
♣
A 7 6 2
EW 4N; EW 3♥; EW 4♦; EW 3♣; EW 1♠; Par −630
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ W ♠ 3 3 110 2.00 0.00 4-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT E ♥ 2 4 630 1.00 1.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
3 NT W ♣ 2 5 660 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
K 9 8 7 6
♥
A K 10
♦
5
♣
A Q 9 7
♠
J 5 3 2
♥
9 8 4
♦
K 8 7
♣
J 8 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 4
♥
Q 6
♦
J 10 9 4
♣
K 10 5 4
16 5 8 11
♠
A
♥
J 7 5 3 2
♦
A Q 6 3 2
♣
6 2
NS 6♥; NS 4N; N 4♠; S 3♠; NS 4♦; NS 4♣; Par +1430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♣ 8 5 650 1.75 0.25 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
6 NT S ♥ 6 −2 200 0.25 1.75 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
J 5
♥
3 2
♦
J 6 4
♣
J 10 9 7 6 5
♠
A 10 7 4
♥
Q 6 5 4
♦
Q 3 2
♣
A K
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 9 8 6 3
♥
K 10 8
♦
A 10 9
♣
3 2
3 15 9 13
♠
K 2
♥
A J 9 7
♦
K 8 7 5
♣
Q 8 4
EW 4♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ E ♣ 4 3 140 1.50 0.50 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♠ W ♣ J 3 140 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♠ E ♣ 4 4 170 0.00 2.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
K J 10
♥
A 8 7 2
♦
K 9 7 3
♣
J 5
♠
A 7 5 3
♥
K 6 4
♦
8 5
♣
Q 10 8 4
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 9 8 4 2
♥
9 3
♦
6
♣
9 7 6 3 2
12 9 2 17
♠
6
♥
Q J 10 5
♦
A Q J 10 4 2
♣
A K
NS 6N; NS 6♥; NS 6♦; EW 1♣; Par +1400: EW 7♣×−6
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♥ N ♦ 6 6 1430 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
5 ♥ S ♣ 4 6 680 1.00 1.00 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
5 ♦ S ♠ A 5 600 0.00 2.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
10
♥
Q 9 6 4 2
♦
Q 7 5 2
♣
Q 10 6
♠
K 7
♥
K 10 5 3
♦
3
♣
J 9 8 5 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A 9 5 3
♥
A J 8
♦
9 8 6
♣
A K 7
6 7 16 11
♠
Q J 8 6 4 2
♥
7
♦
A K J 10 4
♣
4
EW 5♣; EW 3♥; EW 2N; NS 3♦; NS 1♠; Par −500: NS 5♦×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ S ♣ 5 4 130 2.00 0.00 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♦ S ♥ 3 3 110 1.00 1.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ N ♦ 3 −1 100 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
Q 2
♥
A Q J 7 3
♦
J 9 8 7 2
♣
5
♠
J 9 7
♥
K 8 4
♦
A 4
♣
J 8 7 6 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A 5 4
♥
10 9 5 2
♦
K Q 5 3
♣
10 4
10 9 9 12
♠
K 10 8 6 3
♥
6
♦
10 6
♣
A K Q 9 3
NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♣ 5 2 110 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT N ♦ 3 −1 50 0.50 1.50 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT S ♣ 6 −1 50 0.50 1.50 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
10 9 6 4 2
♥
A J 10
♦
8 6 5
♣
K 4
♠
K Q 8 5
♥
Q 5
♦
J
♣
A 10 9 6 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
J 7
♥
K 7 6 4 2
♦
A Q 7 2
♣
Q 8
8 12 12 8
♠
A 3
♥
9 8 3
♦
K 10 9 4 3
♣
J 7 2
E 2N; EW 3♣; W 1N; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par −120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣ W ♥ A −3 150 2.00 0.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣ W ♦ 8 −1 50 0.50 1.50 5-Ciolli-Kitamura vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
2 ♥ W ♠ A −1 50 0.50 1.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Palmer-Palmer
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
K Q 6 3
♥
Q J 9 8 7 2
♦
Q
♣
K 8
♠
8 7 4
♥
A K
♦
A J 8 3
♣
J 10 9 7
N
W
E
S
♠
A 2
♥
10 6 5 3
♦
K 4
♣
Q 6 5 4 2
13 13 9 5
♠
J 10 9 5
♥
4
♦
10 9 7 6 5 2
♣
A 3
NS 4♠; EW 4♣; EW 2N; NS 2♥; Par +200: EW 5♣×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ N ♦ K −1 50 2.00 0.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
2 ♥ N ♣ Q −2 100 1.00 1.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT W ♠ J 2 120 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
J 8 7 3
♥
8 6
♦
5 3
♣
K 10 5 3 2
♠
Q 10 5
♥
9 5
♦
Q 8 7 6 4
♣
A 7 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A K 9
♥
A K Q 10
♦
A J 2
♣
Q J 8
4 8 24 4
♠
6 4 2
♥
J 7 4 3 2
♦
K 10 9
♣
9 4
EW 5N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 5♦; EW 3♣; Par −460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 NT W ♠ 4 −2 100 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
4 NT E ♣ 4 5 460 1.00 1.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♥ 3 6 490 0.00 2.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
A Q 5 4
♥
Q 7
♦
K Q 10 8 6
♣
8 2
♠
K J 6
♥
A K J 10 9 5
♦
—
♣
A Q J 5
N
W
E
S
♠
10 8 2
♥
6 4 2
♦
9 7 5
♣
K 10 9 4
13 19 3 5
♠
9 7 3
♥
8 3
♦
A J 4 3 2
♣
7 6 3
EW 5♥; EW 5♣; NS 2♦; W 1♠; Par −450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♦ N ♥ A −1 100 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♥ W ♣ 8 5 200 1.00 1.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ W ♦ K 5 450 0.00 2.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
10 9 8 7
♥
9 5 4
♦
J 8 7 3
♣
10 7
♠
A 5
♥
7 3 2
♦
10 9 6
♣
A K 6 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 6 4
♥
A K 10 8
♦
A K Q 2
♣
2
1 11 20 8
♠
Q 3 2
♥
Q J 6
♦
5 4
♣
Q J 9 8 4
E 6N; EW 6♥; EW 6♦; W 5N; EW 5♠; EW 4♣; Par −1440
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♣ 8 3 600 1.50 0.50 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
3 NT W ♥ Q 3 600 1.50 0.50 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
6 NT E ♣ 4 6 1440 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
Q 9 8 6 5 4 3 2
♥
8 6 2
♦
9 7
♣
—
♠
J 10
♥
A 7
♦
A Q 10 3 2
♣
J 8 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 7
♥
K Q J 4
♦
J 8 6
♣
A Q 7 3
2 12 16 10
♠
A
♥
10 9 5 3
♦
K 5 4
♣
K 10 9 6 4
EW 5N; W 3♥; EW 4♣; E 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 1♠; Par −660
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦ E ♥ 8 −1 100 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♣ W ♠ 6 4 130 1.00 1.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E ♣ 6 5 660 0.00 2.00 2-Rankin-Adair vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
A 10 5 4 3
♥
K 10
♦
10 9 3
♣
K J 4
♠
K J
♥
A J 8 6 2
♦
A J 5
♣
9 8 3
N
W
E
S
♠
9 8 7
♥
3
♦
K 8 7 6 4
♣
7 6 5 2
11 14 3 12
♠
Q 6 2
♥
Q 9 7 5 4
♦
Q 2
♣
A Q 10
NS 2♠; S 2♥; S 1N; EW 2♦; N 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +100: EW 3♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♥ 3 4 620 2.00 0.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
2 ♠ S ♥ 3 2 110 1.00 1.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
3 ♠ N ♥ 3 −1 100 0.00 2.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
9
♥
9 8 4 3
♦
7 6
♣
A J 10 5 4 3
♠
A 8 4 3 2
♥
A 7 2
♦
9 4 3
♣
K 7
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q 7 6
♥
Q 10 6 5
♦
A J 10 8 5
♣
—
5 11 12 12
♠
J 10 5
♥
K J
♦
K Q 2
♣
Q 9 8 6 2
EW 4♠; EW 4♦; NS 4♣; EW 2♥; EW 1N; Par −100: NS 5♣×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣× N ♠ A −1 100 2.00 0.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
4 ♠ W ♣ A 4 620 0.50 1.50 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
4 ♠ W ♣ A 4 620 0.50 1.50 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
8 6 5
♥
A 7
♦
K Q 10 3
♣
K 8 4 2
♠
J 7
♥
10 6 4 3
♦
7 6 2
♣
10 9 7 5
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 9 4
♥
K 9 8 2
♦
J
♣
A Q 6 3
12 1 16 11
♠
K 10 3 2
♥
Q J 5
♦
A 9 8 5 4
♣
J
N 2N; N 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♦; S 1N; S 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ W ♥ A −3 300 2.00 0.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
3 ♥ E ♦ 9 −1 100 1.00 1.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
1 NT W ♠ 5 4 180 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
10 3
♥
J 10 2
♦
A 8 3
♣
K J 8 5 4
♠
9 8 4
♥
A K 7 6 3
♦
Q
♣
10 9 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 6 5 2
♥
9 8 4
♦
10 7 6 5
♣
A 7
9 9 6 16
♠
A K J 7
♥
Q 5
♦
K J 9 4 2
♣
Q 6
S 4N; NS 4♠; NS 4♦; N 2N; NS 3♣; NS 1♥; Par +430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♥ A 3 400 2.00 0.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
2 ♦ S ♥ A 3 110 1.00 1.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
3 NT S ♥ 4 −1 50 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
J 5 3
♥
3
♦
A Q 10 6 3
♣
K J 6 3
♠
7 6 2
♥
9 6 5 2
♦
9 8 7 4
♣
A 10
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q 10 9
♥
J
♦
K 5 2
♣
Q 9 8 7 5
11 4 11 14
♠
A 8 4
♥
A K Q 10 8 7 4
♦
J
♣
4 2
N 5N; N 5♥; S 4N; S 4♥; N 2♦; NS 1♠; S 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ N ♠ 7 3 140 2.00 0.00 3-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ S ♠ 2 −1 50 1.00 1.00 1-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bloch-Keplinger
6 ♥ S ♣ A −3 150 0.00 2.00 6-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Ciolli-Kitamura
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
