To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session May 29, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 50.0 Section E North-South
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
1 53.00 53.00 A 1 0.50(A) Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura
3 52.00 52.00 B 2 1 0.35(A) Dan Bloch - Richard Keplinger
2 46.50 46.50 A Thomas Ciolli - Jim Ciolli
4 31.00 31.00 C Carol Eklund - Susan Mumenthaler
5 67.50 67.50 A NE John Lagodimos - Kathie Angione
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session May 29, 2013
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 50.0 Section E East-West
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
5 61.50 61.50 C 1 1 1 0.50(A) Dave Cleary - Fred Goodsell
4 54.50 54.50 C 2 2 2 0.35(A) Sharyn Pyrz - Barbara Main
2 50.00 50.00 C Roy Shepard - Tom Turner
3 45.50 45.50 C Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
1 38.50 38.50 A Marge Van Hemert - Carol Adair
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
K 9 6
♥
A 10 8 4
♦
A 10 4
♣
10 4 3
♠
A Q 2
♥
Q J 9 6
♦
8 2
♣
K Q 8 2
N
W
E
S
♠
J 10 8 5 4
♥
K 7 3
♦
K Q 7
♣
9 6
11 14 9 6
♠
7 3
♥
5 2
♦
J 9 6 5 3
♣
A J 7 5
EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2♥; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♠ E ♥ 5 1 80 4.00 0.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♠ E ♥ 5 2 110 3.00 1.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Pyrz-Main
1 NT E ♥ 4 2 120 2.00 2.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 2-Shepard-Turner
2 ♠ E ♣ A 3 140 1.00 3.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT W ♥ 4 3 150 0.00 4.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
9 8 2
♥
K 10 6 2
♦
K 8 7
♣
Q 10 7
♠
7 3
♥
A Q J 5 4
♦
A J 9 3
♣
A 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 4
♥
—
♦
10 6 5 4 2
♣
9 8 6 5 4 3
8 16 3 13
♠
A Q J 10 6 5
♥
9 8 7 3
♦
Q
♣
K J
E 4♦; NS 2♥; W 3♦; E 3♣; NS 1N; W 2♣; NS 1♠; Par −130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ S ♣ A 4 170 3.50 0.50 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ N ♣ A 4 170 3.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Pyrz-Main
2 ♠ S ♣ A 3 140 1.50 2.50 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
3 ♠ S ♣ A 3 140 1.50 2.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 ♠ S ♣ A −1 100 0.00 4.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 7 3
♥
K 7 5 4
♦
K 8 7 2
♣
10 6
♠
A 10 8 6 5
♥
Q 10 8
♦
Q 10 6
♣
J 9
N
W
E
S
♠
J 4
♥
J 9 6 3 2
♦
J 5 3
♣
A K 5
8 9 10 13
♠
K 9 2
♥
A
♦
A 9 4
♣
Q 8 7 4 3 2
EW 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1♦; Par +110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♠ J 4 430 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Pyrz-Main
2 ♣ S ♠ 10 3 110 2.50 1.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♣ S ♠ 6 3 110 2.50 1.50 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
2 ♦ S ♣ J −1 50 0.50 3.50 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT N ♠ J −1 50 0.50 3.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 2-Shepard-Turner
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
A 9 8 7 4
♥
K 6 5 3 2
♦
Q J 3
♣
—
♠
Q J 10 3
♥
7
♦
9 8 7 5 2
♣
K 9 3
N
W
E
S
♠
2
♥
A Q J 9 8
♦
10 6 4
♣
Q 6 5 2
10 6 9 15
♠
K 6 5
♥
10 4
♦
A K
♣
A J 10 8 7 4
NS 3♠; NS 2N; NS 2♥; NS 2♣; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N 4 620 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Pyrz-Main
3 NT S ♦ 5 3 600 3.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♠ N ♥ Q 3 140 2.00 2.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
3 ♣ S ♣ 3 3 110 1.00 3.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 ♣ S ♥ 7 −1 100 0.00 4.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
K 9 6
♥
10 9 8
♦
K Q 9
♣
J 9 5 4
♠
A Q 10 7 4 3
♥
7
♦
J 10 7 6 4
♣
K
N
W
E
S
♠
5 2
♥
A J 6 2
♦
A 8 5 3 2
♣
Q 7
9 10 11 10
♠
J 8
♥
K Q 5 4 3
♦
—
♣
A 10 8 6 3 2
EW 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; EW 3♦; NS 1N; Par +100: EW 4♦×−1; EW 4♠×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠× W ♥ 9 −2 300 4.00 0.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ S ♦ J 3 140 3.00 1.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Pyrz-Main
4 ♦ E ♣ A −1 50 1.50 2.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
4 ♠ W ♣ 4 −1 50 1.50 2.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 ♠ W ♣ J 3 140 0.00 4.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 10
♥
J 9 6 4 3
♦
A 10 7 6
♣
J 9
♠
A J 7
♥
A 10 7 5
♦
Q 9 5
♣
K 10 7
N
W
E
S
♠
K 8 6 4 2
♥
K Q 2
♦
J 8 3
♣
A Q
8 14 15 3
♠
9 5 3
♥
8
♦
K 4 2
♣
8 6 5 4 3 2
EW 5N; EW 5♠; EW 3♥; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −660
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♥ 8 −2 200 4.00 0.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Pyrz-Main
3 NT E ♣ 4 −1 100 3.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♠ E ♣ 6 4 620 2.00 2.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
3 NT E ♣ 4 4 630 1.00 3.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 NT E ♥ 8 5 660 0.00 4.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
K J 7 3
♥
A Q 7 6 3
♦
K 4 2
♣
10
♠
Q 4
♥
10 8 4
♦
A Q J 10 9
♣
J 8 3
N
W
E
S
♠
6
♥
J 9 5 2
♦
8 3
♣
K Q 9 6 5 2
13 10 6 11
♠
A 10 9 8 5 2
♥
K
♦
7 6 5
♣
A 7 4
NS 6♠; NS 4N; NS 4♥; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +1430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♦ Q 7 710 4.00 0.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♠ S ♦ A 6 680 1.50 2.50 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Turner
4 ♠ S ♥ 10 6 680 1.50 2.50 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Pyrz-Main
4 ♠ S ♣ 3 6 680 1.50 2.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
5 ♠ S ♦ A 6 680 1.50 2.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
10 6 4 2
♥
10 6 3
♦
—
♣
A 10 7 5 4 2
♠
A 8
♥
9 8 4
♦
A J 10 7 3
♣
K 8 6
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q J 9 7 5
♥
K J 7 5
♦
6 5 2
♣
—
4 12 10 14
♠
3
♥
A Q 2
♦
K Q 9 8 4
♣
Q J 9 3
NS 4♣; W 2♠; E 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠× E ♣ Q −3 500 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♣ N ♦ 5 4 130 3.00 1.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Pyrz-Main
2 ♠ E ♠ 3 −1 50 1.50 2.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
3 ♠ E ♦ 8 −1 50 1.50 2.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
3 NT W ♣ 5 4 430 0.00 4.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Turner
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 9 2
♥
Q 7 4 2
♦
7 4
♣
A 10 7 4
♠
J 6 5 4
♥
9 8 5
♦
8 5
♣
6 5 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 7 3
♥
A K 3
♦
A K 10 2
♣
Q J 8
8 1 20 11
♠
A 10 8
♥
J 10 6
♦
Q J 9 6 3
♣
K 9
NS 2N; NS 2♥; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par +120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT× E ♦ Q −3 800 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 NT E ♦ Q −3 300 2.50 1.50 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Turner
2 NT E ♦ 6 −3 300 2.50 1.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 NT E ♦ 6 −1 100 1.00 3.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
2 ♦ S ♠ 4 −1 50 0.00 4.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Pyrz-Main
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
7 3
♥
9 2
♦
10 8 5 4 2
♣
6 5 4 3
♠
J 10 4
♥
K Q 10 6 5 3
♦
A J
♣
Q J
N
W
E
S
♠
A K 9 8
♥
J 4
♦
9 7 6 3
♣
A 8 7
0 14 12 14
♠
Q 6 5 2
♥
A 8 7
♦
K Q
♣
K 10 9 2
EW 4N; EW 4♥; EW 3♠; EW 1♦; E 1♣; Par −630
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♣ 2 −2 200 4.00 0.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Shepard-Turner
2 ♥ W ♣ 6 4 170 2.50 1.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♥ W ♣ 6 4 170 2.50 1.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ E ♦ K 4 620 0.50 3.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♥ W ♦ 2 4 620 0.50 3.50 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 4-Pyrz-Main
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
7 4
♥
7 2
♦
A K 10 8 4
♣
Q J 6 2
♠
A J 10 9 5 3
♥
Q J 8 5
♦
5
♣
A 3
N
W
E
S
♠
K 8 6 2
♥
A K 10 4
♦
Q 7 2
♣
K 8
10 12 15 3
♠
Q
♥
9 6 3
♦
J 9 6 3
♣
10 9 7 5 4
EW 6♠; EW 6♥; EW 5N; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −980
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ W ♦ K 6 480 2.00 2.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Pyrz-Main
4 ♠ W ♦ A 6 480 2.00 2.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
4 ♠ W ♦ A 6 480 2.00 2.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ W ♦ A 6 480 2.00 2.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♠ W ♦ A 6 480 2.00 2.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Shepard-Turner
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
K 8 7 6 5
♥
6 4
♦
9 5 2
♣
A 10 7
♠
Q 9 3
♥
A Q 9
♦
A Q
♣
Q 6 5 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
2
♥
J 10 7 5 2
♦
K 8 6 3
♣
K 8 3
7 16 7 10
♠
A J 10 4
♥
K 8 3
♦
J 10 7 4
♣
J 9
EW 4♥; EW 4♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♠; Par −420
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT W ♠ 7 −2 100 4.00 0.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT W ♠ 7 1 90 3.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Pyrz-Main
4 ♥ W ♥ 6 4 420 1.50 2.50 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
4 ♥ W ♥ 6 4 420 1.50 2.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Shepard-Turner
4 ♥ W ♠ 9 6 480 0.00 4.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
K 6 5 3
♥
5 4
♦
K 4 2
♣
A K 4 3
♠
A J 2
♥
K 10 2
♦
9 7 6
♣
10 8 6 5
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 7
♥
7 3
♦
A Q J 8 3
♣
Q J 7
13 8 12 7
♠
9 8 4
♥
A Q J 9 8 6
♦
10 5
♣
9 2
NS 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♠; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ S ♦ 5 3 140 4.00 0.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♥ S ♦ 9 2 110 3.00 1.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ S ♦ 6 −1 100 1.50 2.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Pyrz-Main
2 ♥ S ♦ 9 −1 100 1.50 2.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Shepard-Turner
2 ♦ W ♥ 4 3 110 0.00 4.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
K J 10 4
♥
9 6 5
♦
A J 10 7
♣
K 9
♠
A Q 9 6 2
♥
A Q 7 4 3
♦
4
♣
10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
8 3
♥
8
♦
Q 9 8 5
♣
J 7 6 5 4 2
12 12 3 13
♠
7 5
♥
K J 10 2
♦
K 6 3 2
♣
A Q 8
NS 4N; NS 3♥; S 2♠; S 3♦; N 2♦; N 1♠; NS 1♣; Par +430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥× W ♣ K −4 800 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 NT S ♥ 4 3 400 3.00 1.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
3 ♦ S ♥ A 3 110 2.00 2.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♦ S ♣ 10 −3 150 0.50 3.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Pyrz-Main
3 ♥ S ♥ 3 −3 150 0.50 3.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
A 10 6 5 2
♥
K J 7
♦
K 8 6 2
♣
Q
♠
K 8
♥
A 10 5 4 3
♦
A
♣
K 10 9 8 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q J 7
♥
8 2
♦
10 9 5 3
♣
A J 6 2
13 14 8 5
♠
9 4 3
♥
Q 9 6
♦
Q J 7 4
♣
7 5 4
EW 3N; EW 5♣; EW 3♥; NS 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −400
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♥ 8 2 110 4.00 0.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♣ W ♦ 2 3 110 3.00 1.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♣ W ♠ A 4 130 1.50 2.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♣ W ♠ A 4 130 1.50 2.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 ♣ W ♣ Q 5 150 0.00 4.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Pyrz-Main
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
9 7 5 3
♥
J 3
♦
10 9 7 4
♣
A K J
♠
—
♥
K 10 7 6
♦
A K 8 3
♣
Q 10 8 6 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 10 6
♥
Q 9 8 5 4 2
♦
Q J
♣
9 3
9 12 8 11
♠
A Q J 8 4 2
♥
A
♦
6 5 2
♣
7 5 4
NS 4N; EW 4♥; NS 3♠; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +200: EW 5♥×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ S ♥ K 5 450 4.00 0.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ S ♦ A 4 420 3.00 1.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Shepard-Turner
5 ♠ S ♦ A −2 100 2.00 2.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♥ E ♠ Q 4 620 1.00 3.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 4-Pyrz-Main
4 ♥× E ♦ 4 5 990 0.00 4.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
K
♥
K J 8 7 4
♦
10 9 8
♣
8 6 5 3
♠
Q 10 6
♥
A Q 5
♦
A K 4 2
♣
Q 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠
8 5 3
♥
9
♦
Q J 7 6 5
♣
J 10 9 4
7 17 4 12
♠
A J 9 7 4 2
♥
10 6 3 2
♦
3
♣
A K
NS 5♥; NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥× N ♣ J 4 630 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♠ S ♦ A 4 170 3.00 1.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Shepard-Turner
2 ♠ S ♦ A 2 110 2.00 2.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 4-Pyrz-Main
3 ♦ W ♠ K −2 100 1.00 3.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
1 NT W ♠ K 1 90 0.00 4.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
K Q J 8 4
♥
A 8 5
♦
K 7 5
♣
Q 8
♠
A 6 5 3
♥
Q 9 6 4
♦
9 8
♣
A K 2
N
W
E
S
♠
9 2
♥
K J 3
♦
A Q J
♣
J 10 7 6 3
15 13 12 0
♠
10 7
♥
10 7 2
♦
10 6 4 3 2
♣
9 5 4
EW 5♥; EW 3N; EW 5♣; EW 2♠; EW 1♦; Par −450
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♠ K −2 100 3.50 0.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT× E ♠ 10 −1 100 3.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 ♣ W ♠ K 2 90 2.00 2.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
3 NT E ♠ 10 3 400 1.00 3.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Shepard-Turner
4 ♥ W ♠ K 4 420 0.00 4.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 4-Pyrz-Main
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
A Q 9 6 3
♥
A 6 5
♦
Q 5 4
♣
10 5
♠
K 10 8 7 5
♥
Q J 8 4 3
♦
—
♣
K 3 2
N
W
E
S
♠
J 4 2
♥
2
♦
K 10 8 3 2
♣
Q 9 7 6
12 9 6 13
♠
—
♥
K 10 9 7
♦
A J 9 7 6
♣
A J 8 4
S 4N; N 3N; NS 3♥; NS 4♦; NS 2♣; Par +430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♠ J 4 430 3.50 0.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT N ♦ 3 4 430 3.50 0.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
3 NT S ♥ 4 3 400 2.00 2.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 NT N ♠ 4 −1 50 1.00 3.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
3 ♥ S ♠ 8 −3 150 0.00 4.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 4-Pyrz-Main
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
5 3
♥
Q 9 7
♦
K 9 7 3 2
♣
K 7 5
♠
A Q J 9
♥
K 6 3
♦
A 8 5
♣
A Q J
N
W
E
S
♠
6 4
♥
J 8 5 2
♦
4
♣
10 9 8 4 3 2
8 21 1 10
♠
K 10 8 7 2
♥
A 10 4
♦
Q J 10 6
♣
6
EW 4♣; EW 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; Par −130
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 NT× W ♦ 4 −2 500 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
2 NT W ♦ 3 −4 400 3.00 1.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 2-Shepard-Turner
2 NT W ♦ 3 −3 300 2.00 2.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♠ W ♦ 9 −2 200 1.00 3.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 4-Pyrz-Main
2 NT W ♦ 3 −1 100 0.00 4.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
Q 6 3
♥
10 3
♦
9 5
♣
A J 9 8 5 2
♠
A K 10
♥
K 7 5
♦
K J 10 6 2
♣
10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
J 8 7
♥
Q J 4 2
♦
A Q 7 3
♣
6 4
7 14 10 9
♠
9 5 4 2
♥
A 9 8 6
♦
8 4
♣
K Q 7
EW 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; EW 1♠; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♦ W ♥ 10 −1 50 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
3 ♦ W ♦ 5 3 110 2.50 1.50 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Pyrz-Main
3 ♦ W ♣ A 3 110 2.50 1.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♦ W ♥ 10 4 130 1.00 3.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Shepard-Turner
2 ♥ E ♦ 8 3 140 0.00 4.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
A K 5 3
♥
10
♦
J 8 4 3
♣
A 9 6 4
♠
10 9 6 2
♥
J 7 5 3
♦
A Q 10 9 5
♣
—
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 8 7 4
♥
A 9 8 4 2
♦
K 7
♣
8 2
12 7 9 12
♠
J
♥
K Q 6
♦
6 2
♣
K Q J 10 7 5 3
NS 3N; EW 3♥; NS 4♣; EW 2♠; EW 1♦; Par +200: EW 4♥×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♦ K 4 430 4.00 0.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
5 ♣ S ♥ 3 5 400 3.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 ♣ S ♠ 10 5 150 2.00 2.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Pyrz-Main
3 ♣ S ♥ 3 4 130 0.50 3.50 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
4 ♣ S ♦ A 4 130 0.50 3.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
K 7 2
♥
10 9 8 4 2
♦
4
♣
A K Q 5
♠
9 8 4 3
♥
A 5
♦
Q 9 6 3
♣
J 10 6
N
W
E
S
♠
A J
♥
Q 6 3
♦
K 10 2
♣
9 8 7 3 2
12 7 10 11
♠
Q 10 6 5
♥
K J 7
♦
A J 8 7 5
♣
4
NS 4♥; NS 3N; NS 3♠; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♠ 3 5 660 4.00 0.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
4 ♥ N ♣ 9 5 650 3.00 1.00 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Shepard-Turner
3 ♥ N ♦ 10 5 200 2.00 2.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
2 ♥ N ♠ A 3 140 1.00 3.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Pyrz-Main
4 ♠ S ♥ A −1 100 0.00 4.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
Q 9
♥
K 6 5
♦
K 8 7 3
♣
J 10 4 3
♠
10 7 5
♥
A 4 3
♦
A J 5 4 2
♣
A K
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 6 3 2
♥
10 9 8 2
♦
10
♣
8 7 6
9 16 4 11
♠
A 8 4
♥
Q J 7
♦
Q 9 6
♣
Q 9 5 2
EW 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 1N; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT W ♦ 3 −2 100 4.00 0.00 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
1 ♦ W ♣ 3 1 70 2.50 1.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Shepard-Turner
1 ♦ W ♣ 3 1 70 2.50 1.50 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Pyrz-Main
1 NT W ♣ 3 1 90 1.00 3.00 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♠ W ♣ 3 2 110 0.00 4.00 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
J 9 6 5
♥
10
♦
K Q 8 3
♣
J 10 8 3
♠
K 8 3
♥
Q J 8 7 6
♦
A J
♣
K 5 2
N
W
E
S
♠
A Q 10 4
♥
A 5 3 2
♦
10 9 6 4
♣
A
7 14 14 5
♠
7 2
♥
K 9 4
♦
7 5 2
♣
Q 9 7 6 4
W 5N; EW 5♠; EW 5♥; E 4N; EW 3♦; EW 1♣; Par −660
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ W ♦ K 5 650 2.50 1.50 1-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Shepard-Turner
5 ♥ W ♦ K 5 650 2.50 1.50 3-Bloch-Keplinger vs 1-Van Hemert-Adair
4 ♥ W ♦ K 5 650 2.50 1.50 4-Eklund-Mumenthaler vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♥ W 5 650 2.50 1.50 5-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Cleary-Goodsell
4 ♥ W ♠ 5 6 680 0.00 4.00 2-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 4-Pyrz-Main
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
