NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE
Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.
Click the Wednesday Game to view an analyses of the bidding and play.
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
|
|
Oct 6 Pm Wednesday Eve Session October 6, 2010
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 24.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Sectn Rank MPs
A B
1 55.21 26.50 B 3/4 1/2 0.30(A) Richard Keplinger - Cheryl Rankin
2 41.67 20.00 A Betty Birmingham - Rose Krucoff
3 55.21 26.50 B 3/4 1/2 0.30(A) Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
4 58.33 28.00 A 1 0.70(A) Tom Turner - Trish Lane
6 56.25 27.00 A 2 0.49(A) Jim Ciolli - Thomas Ciolli
7 46.88 22.50 B Lois Richards - Marge Van Hemert
8 36.46 17.50 B Hiroko Kitamura - Judi Bunch
|
E 4N; EW 5♦; W 2N; E 2♥; EW 1♠; W 1♥; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 2.00 0.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
420 1.00 1.00 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 4-Turner-Lane
650 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6♥; EW 6♣; EW 4♦; EW 1N |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
480 0.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 4-Turner-Lane
480 0.50 1.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♦; EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 3♣; W 1♠ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.00 0.00 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 4-Turner-Lane
100 0.50 1.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
100 0.50 1.50 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3N; EW 5♦; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 2♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 4-Turner-Lane
150 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
600 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 3N; EW 4♣; NS 1♥; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 2.00 0.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
120 0.50 1.50 4-Turner-Lane vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
120 0.50 1.50 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♦; EW 2N; N 2♠; NS 2♥; S 1♠; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
50 1.00 1.00 4-Turner-Lane vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
660 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
| ||||||||||||||||||
E 5N; E 5♠; W 4N; W 4♠; E 5♣; W 4♣; EW 3♦; NS 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 2.00 0.00 4-Turner-Lane vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
650 1.00 1.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
680 0.00 2.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; EW 3♣; NS 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♠ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 1.50 0.50 4-Turner-Lane vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
140 1.50 0.50 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
50 0.00 2.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 5♣; NS 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 1.00 1.00 4-Turner-Lane vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
430 1.00 1.00 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
430 1.00 1.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 5♣; EW 2♠; NS 3♦; EW 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 2.00 0.00 4-Turner-Lane vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
600 1.00 1.00 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
400 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 4♣; NS 2N; NS 3♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 4-Turner-Lane vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
100 1.00 1.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
300 0.00 2.00 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; NS 4♥; EW 3♦; EW 1N; EW 2♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
590 1.00 1.00 4-Turner-Lane vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
590 1.00 1.00 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
590 1.00 1.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 7N; NS 7♠; NS 7♥; NS 1♦; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1480 2.00 0.00 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
710 1.00 1.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 4-Turner-Lane
680 0.00 2.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6♣; EW 4N; EW 5♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
150 1.00 1.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
170 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 4-Turner-Lane
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♥; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 4-Turner-Lane
110 0.50 1.50 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
110 0.50 1.50 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 2♣; S 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
110 0.50 1.50 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
110 0.50 1.50 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 4-Turner-Lane
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; NS 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
140 1.00 1.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
420 0.00 2.00 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Turner-Lane
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 5♦; NS 2♥; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 2.00 0.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
100 0.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.50 1.50 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Turner-Lane
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♠; NS 3♦; NS 1N; NS 2♣; EW 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 2.00 0.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
110 0.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
110 0.50 1.50 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Turner-Lane
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 4♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦; NS 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 2.00 0.00 6-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 1-Keplinger-Rankin
620 0.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
620 0.50 1.50 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Turner-Lane
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; EW 1♦; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 1.50 0.50 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
140 1.50 0.50 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
90 0.00 2.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Lane
| ||||||||||||||||||
E 4♠; EW 3N; W 3♠; E 2♦; NS 2♣; E 1♥; W 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Lane
50 1.00 1.00 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
140 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♣; NS 2♦; EW 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
90 1.00 1.00 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Lane
300 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 7N; NS 7♥; NS 7♣; NS 4♦; NS 2♠ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 1.50 0.50 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Lane
480 1.50 0.50 7-Richards-Van Hemert vs 2-Birmingham-Krucoff
450 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; NS 2N; NS 3♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 1.50 0.50 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
420 1.50 0.50 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
50 0.00 2.00 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6N; EW 6♣; EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 0.00 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
620 1.00 1.00 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1370 0.00 2.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.00 0.00 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
140 1.00 1.00 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
150 0.00 2.00 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; N 3♥; S 2♥; N 1N; EW 2♦; EW 2♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 2.00 0.00 1-Keplinger-Rankin vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Krucoff vs 6-Ciolli-Ciolli
100 0.50 1.50 8-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Richards-Van Hemert
| ||||||||||||||||||
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008