NEWSLETTER | PHOTOS | RECIPES | CONVENTION CARD | COMMENT | MASTERPOINT RACE
Click --> HAND PRINTOUT to view all hands or RECAP for recap format.
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
|
|
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session September 8, 2010
Scores after 28 boards Average: 42.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Sectn Rank MPs
A B
1 53.08 44.59 A 3 0.40(A) Trish Lane - Tom Turner
2 52.58 44.17 A Betty Birmingham - Fred Nimtz
3 50.39 42.33 B 2 0.17(B) Lois Richards - Marge Van Hemert
4 42.65 35.83 B Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
5 57.14 48.00 A 2 0.56(A) Jim Ciolli - Thomas Ciolli
6 59.52 50.00 B 1 1 0.80(A) Hiroko Kitamura - Judi Bunch
7 40.08 33.67 A Kathie Angione - Richard Keplinger
8 44.44 37.33 B Cheryl Rankin - Martha Walker
|
EW 3♠; EW 3♣; NS 2♦; NS 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.50 0.50 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
100 2.50 0.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 1-Lane-Turner
140 1.00 2.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
450 0.00 3.00 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♦; NS 3♣; EW 1N; NS 1♠; EW 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 0.00 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
90 2.00 1.00 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
120 1.00 2.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
130 0.00 3.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 1-Lane-Turner
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 4♦; NS 2♥; NS 1♠; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
460 3.00 0.00 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
400 2.00 1.00 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
170 1.00 2.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 1-Lane-Turner
130 0.00 3.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; EW 2♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 2.83 0.17 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
650 1.50 1.50 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
620 0.17 2.83 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
E 2N; EW 2♠; W 1N; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 3.00 0.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
110 2.00 1.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lane-Turner
200 1.00 2.00 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
300 0.00 3.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 2N; NS 2♦; E 1♥; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 3.00 0.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
170 2.00 1.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
140 0.50 2.50 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
140 0.50 2.50 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lane-Turner
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 5N; NS 5♥; NS 5♦; NS 3♠; NS 4♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 3.00 0.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
650 2.00 1.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
130 1.00 2.00 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
1100 0.00 3.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lane-Turner
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♠; NS 3N; NS 4♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 3.00 0.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
420 2.00 1.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
130 1.00 2.00 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
150 0.00 3.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lane-Turner
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 4♦; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 2.50 0.50 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
400 2.50 0.50 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 1-Lane-Turner
120 1.00 2.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
110 0.00 3.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 2♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 3.00 0.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
100 2.00 1.00 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 1-Lane-Turner
110 1.00 2.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
130 0.00 3.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 6N; NS 6♠; NS 6♣; NS 2♥; S 2♦; N 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
480 3.00 0.00 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 1-Lane-Turner
450 2.00 1.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
230 1.00 2.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
200 0.00 3.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 5N; NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 2♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
660 2.50 0.50 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
660 2.50 0.50 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 1-Lane-Turner
630 0.50 2.50 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
630 0.50 2.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.00 0.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
130 2.00 1.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
630 0.50 2.50 1-Lane-Turner vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
630 0.50 2.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 7♠; NS 6♥; NS 6♦; NS 5N; NS 2♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1010 2.00 1.00 1-Lane-Turner vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
1010 2.00 1.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
1010 2.00 1.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
510 0.00 3.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 3♣; EW 2♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.00 0.00 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
300 2.00 1.00 1-Lane-Turner vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
100 0.50 2.50 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
100 0.50 2.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♣; NS 2♦; EW 1♠ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 3.00 0.00 1-Lane-Turner vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
130 2.00 1.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
620 0.50 2.50 5-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
620 0.50 2.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2N; NS 3♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♠ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 2.50 0.50 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
50 2.50 0.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
80 1.00 2.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Lane-Turner
100 0.00 3.00 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 4♥; EW 3♦; NS 1N; EW 2♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 2.50 0.50 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
680 2.50 0.50 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
620 1.00 2.00 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Lane-Turner
170 0.00 3.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
W 4N; EW 4♥; E 3N; EW 4♣; EW 2♠; EW 3♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 3.00 0.00 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
600 1.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
600 1.50 1.50 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Lane-Turner
630 0.00 3.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
E 2N; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 3.00 0.00 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
100 1.50 1.50 6-Kitamura-Bunch vs 1-Lane-Turner
100 1.50 1.50 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.00 3.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; EW 5♦; EW 2N; EW 2♣; W 1♥ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
450 1.50 1.50 1-Lane-Turner vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
450 1.50 1.50 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
450 1.50 1.50 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
450 1.50 1.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 4N; NS 4♥; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♦ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 2.50 0.50 1-Lane-Turner vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
170 2.50 0.50 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
50 0.50 2.50 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
50 0.50 2.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 5N; NS 5♠; N 2♥; NS 2♦; S 1♥; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 3.00 0.00 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
660 2.00 1.00 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
650 1.00 2.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
100 0.00 3.00 1-Lane-Turner vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; NS 2N; NS 2♠; NS 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 3.00 0.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
50 2.00 1.00 1-Lane-Turner vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
100 0.50 2.50 3-Richards-Van Hemert vs 4-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.50 2.50 7-Angione-Keplinger vs 2-Birmingham-Nimtz
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 6N; EW 6♣; EW 5♦; EW 2♥; EW 1♠ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
690 1.50 1.50 1-Lane-Turner vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
690 1.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
690 1.50 1.50 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
690 1.50 1.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 5N; EW 5♥; EW 2♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.50 0.50 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
100 2.50 0.50 8-Rankin-Walker vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
650 0.50 2.50 1-Lane-Turner vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
650 0.50 2.50 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; NS 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 2♦; NS 2♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 3.00 0.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
150 1.50 1.50 1-Lane-Turner vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
150 1.50 1.50 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
120 0.00 3.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
EW 2N; EW 2♠; N 2♦; W 2♣; NS 1♥; S 1♦; E 1♣ |
SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 2.00 1.00 1-Lane-Turner vs 3-Richards-Van Hemert
100 2.00 1.00 2-Birmingham-Nimtz vs 6-Kitamura-Bunch
100 2.00 1.00 8-Rankin-Walker vs 7-Angione-Keplinger
400 0.00 3.00 4-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008