To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session February 19, 2014
Scores after 5 rounds Average: 25.0 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
2 67.00 33.50 C 1 1 1 0.60(A) Fran Hunter - Doral Hunter
4 62.00 31.00 A 2 0.42(A) John Peter Lagodimos - Hiroko Kitamura
1 56.00 28.00 B 2 0.25(B) James Ciolli - Manu Chaganlal
3 50.00 25.00 C Roy Shepard - Thomas Turner
5 35.00 17.50 B Cheryl Rankin - Laraine Havel
6 30.00 15.00 C Vickie Palmer - Darrel Palmer
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
♠
A Q 7 5
♥
A 9 8 6 4
♦
10
♣
A 4 3
♠
J 8 4 3
♥
J
♦
K 8 6 5
♣
K J 9 7
N
W
E
S
♠
K 10 2
♥
Q 10 3
♦
A J 7 3 2
♣
10 5
14 9 10 7
♠
9 6
♥
K 7 5 2
♦
Q 9 4
♣
Q 8 6 2
NS 2♥; EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 1♠; E 1♣; Par +100: EW 2♠×−1; EW 2N×−1; EW 3♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ N ♠ 2 3 140 2.00 0.00 5-Rankin-Havel vs 3-Shepard-Turner
2 ♥ N ♣ 10 2 110 1.00 1.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
4 ♥ N ♦ 3 −1 50 0.00 2.00 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 2 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
8 5
♥
J 5 3
♦
K 2
♣
A 10 9 6 5 2
♠
K
♥
A Q 7 6
♦
Q 8 7 6
♣
K J 4 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A 9 7 3
♥
K 9 4
♦
J 10 3
♣
Q 8 7
8 15 10 7
♠
Q J 10 6 4 2
♥
10 8 2
♦
A 9 5 4
♣
—
EW 2N; E 3♦; W 2♦; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; Par −120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣ E ♠ Q −2 100 2.00 0.00 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT W ♣ 6 4 180 1.00 1.00 5-Rankin-Havel vs 3-Shepard-Turner
3 NT E ♠ Q 3 400 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
A K J 10 6 2
♥
A Q 10
♦
A 7 6
♣
7
♠
8 7 3
♥
9 7 6
♦
J 10 5 3
♣
A 9 5
N
W
E
S
♠
4
♥
K 5 3 2
♦
K 9 8 2
♣
10 8 6 2
18 5 6 11
♠
Q 9 5
♥
J 8 4
♦
Q 4
♣
K Q J 4 3
NS 5N; NS 5♠; NS 3♥; N 4♣; S 3♣; NS 1♦; Par +460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ N ♦ 4 5 450 1.50 0.50 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ N ♣ 2 5 450 1.50 0.50 5-Rankin-Havel vs 3-Shepard-Turner
4 ♠ N ♠ 4 4 420 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
♠
J 10 8 6 3
♥
Q 7
♦
J 6 5 4
♣
5 4
♠
A 9
♥
9 6 3 2
♦
Q 10 3
♣
Q J 10 9
N
W
E
S
♠
7 4
♥
A K J 8
♦
K 9
♣
K 7 6 3 2
4 9 14 13
♠
K Q 5 2
♥
10 5 4
♦
A 8 7 2
♣
A 8
EW 4♥; EW 4♣; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −620
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♥ W ♠ 3 4 170 2.00 0.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
3 ♠ N ♥ A −2 200 0.50 1.50 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ W ♦ 4 5 200 0.50 1.50 5-Rankin-Havel vs 3-Shepard-Turner
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
K Q J 10 6
♥
10 3 2
♦
Q 5 3
♣
J 8
♠
8 7
♥
A K Q 9 4
♦
J 9 4
♣
A 6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
9 5 2
♥
J 8 7
♦
A 6
♣
K 10 9 7 2
9 14 8 9
♠
A 4 3
♥
6 5
♦
K 10 8 7 2
♣
Q 5 3
EW 3♥; EW 2N; EW 3♣; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ W ♠ K 4 170 1.50 0.50 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ W ♠ K 4 170 1.50 0.50 5-Rankin-Havel vs 3-Shepard-Turner
2 ♠ N ♥ 7 −2 200 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
Board 6 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
A J 8 6 4
♥
A 9
♦
A 7 5
♣
K Q 3
♠
K Q 7 2
♥
J 8 7 5
♦
3
♣
A 5 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
9 3
♥
K 10 4
♦
Q 10 4
♣
10 9 8 7 6
18 10 5 7
♠
10 5
♥
Q 6 3 2
♦
K J 9 8 6 2
♣
J
N 5N; S 4N; NS 5♦; NS 3♠; NS 2♥; Par +460
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣× E ♠ 10 −3 800 2.00 0.00 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
1 ♠ N ♣ 6 3 140 1.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 5-Rankin-Havel
2 NT N ♣ 10 −2 100 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
♠
9 7 6 5
♥
8 2
♦
J 10 9 8 5
♣
8 4
♠
10
♥
A K Q 9 7 3
♦
6
♣
K Q J 7 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K Q J 8
♥
J 4
♦
A Q 2
♣
A 10 9 3
1 15 17 7
♠
A 4 3 2
♥
10 6 5
♦
K 7 4 3
♣
6 5
EW 6N; E 6♠; EW 6♥; EW 6♣; W 5♠; EW 3♦; Par −1440
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT E ♠ 3 7 720 2.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 5-Rankin-Havel
6 NT E ♦ 5 6 1440 0.50 1.50 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
6 NT W ♦ J 6 1440 0.50 1.50 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
♠
10 3 2
♥
K 9 5
♦
A Q J 10 2
♣
6 3
♠
A 9 8 7 6
♥
A Q J 8
♦
7
♣
A 10 5
N
W
E
S
♠
Q
♥
10 4 3 2
♦
K 9 8 4 3
♣
Q 9 8
10 15 7 8
♠
K J 5 4
♥
7 6
♦
6 5
♣
K J 7 4 2
EW 3♥; EW 1N; EW 1♠; N 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ N ♠ Q −1 50 2.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 5-Rankin-Havel
2 ♥ W ♣ 6 2 110 0.50 1.50 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
2 ♣ W ♦ Q 3 110 0.50 1.50 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
10 3
♥
J 8 6 4
♦
A Q 10 6 2
♣
K Q
♠
A Q 4 2
♥
A 10 5 3
♦
8 7 3
♣
J 9
N
W
E
S
♠
K J 5
♥
Q 7 2
♦
5 4
♣
A 10 8 6 2
12 11 10 7
♠
9 8 7 6
♥
K 9
♦
K J 9
♣
7 5 4 3
EW 3♠; EW 3♣; EW 1N; EW 1♥; NS 1♦; Par −140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT N ♣ 6 2 120 2.00 0.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 5-Rankin-Havel
2 ♥ N ♦ 8 −1 50 0.50 1.50 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
3 ♦ N ♣ 6 −1 50 0.50 1.50 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
♠
8 7 5
♥
7 6 5 3
♦
10 5
♣
9 6 4 3
♠
Q J 10
♥
A J 10 8
♦
A Q 8 2
♣
J 5
N
W
E
S
♠
A 6 2
♥
Q 9 4 2
♦
K 3
♣
A Q 8 7
0 15 15 10
♠
K 9 4 3
♥
K
♦
J 9 7 6 4
♣
K 10 2
E 6♥; EW 5N; W 5♥; EW 4♠; EW 5♣; E 4♦; W 3♦; Par −1430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 NT× W ♦ 6 −1 200 1.50 0.50 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 5-Rankin-Havel
6 ♥ E −2 200 1.50 0.50 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
5 ♥ W ♠ 3 5 650 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
♠
10 5 2
♥
Q 8 7 5 2
♦
A K 6
♣
Q 7
♠
K Q 7 6 3
♥
10 9 6 4
♦
8 3
♣
5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
A J 4
♥
K J 3
♦
10
♣
A K 9 6 4 2
11 5 16 8
♠
9 8
♥
A
♦
Q J 9 7 5 4 2
♣
J 10 8
EW 4♠; EW 4♣; EW 2♥; NS 3♦; Par −300: NS 5♦×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ S ♣ 5 3 110 1.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
3 ♦ S ♣ 5 3 110 1.50 0.50 5-Rankin-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
2 ♠ W ♥ 2 2 110 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Shepard-Turner
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
♠
A K 9 5
♥
A
♦
A K Q 7 3
♣
A 10 4
♠
Q 10 8 6
♥
8 5
♦
8 5
♣
K J 9 8 5
N
W
E
S
♠
7 4 3
♥
K J 10 6 4
♦
J 10
♣
6 3 2
24 6 5 5
♠
J 2
♥
Q 9 7 3 2
♦
9 6 4 2
♣
Q 7
NS 6♦; NS 5N; NS 4♠; NS 3♥; NS 3♣; Par +1370
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 6 4 630 2.00 0.00 5-Rankin-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
3 NT S ♦ 8 3 600 0.50 1.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
3 NT N ♥ 6 3 600 0.50 1.50 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Shepard-Turner
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
♠
J 8 6
♥
9 8 6 4 3
♦
4 2
♣
10 6 4
♠
A 9 5
♥
A 7
♦
K Q J 9 7 5
♣
J 7
N
W
E
S
♠
K 4
♥
K J
♦
10 8 6 3
♣
Q 8 5 3 2
1 15 9 15
♠
Q 10 7 3 2
♥
Q 10 5 2
♦
A
♣
A K 9
EW 3N; EW 4♦; EW 4♣; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; Par −500: NS 4♥×−2; NS 4♠×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ W ♠ J 5 150 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
2 ♠ W ♠ 6 4 170 1.00 1.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Shepard-Turner
3 NT E ♠ 7 4 630 0.00 2.00 5-Rankin-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
♠
10 7
♥
10 9 8 3
♦
J 6 5 4 3
♣
10 5
♠
A K J 3
♥
Q 6
♦
9 8
♣
A K J 6 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 8 5 2
♥
K J
♦
Q 10 7
♣
Q 9 7 2
1 18 10 11
♠
9 6 4
♥
A 7 5 4 2
♦
A K 2
♣
8 4
EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 4♣; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; Par −430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♠ E ♦ A 4 420 1.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
4 ♠ E ♦ A 4 420 1.00 1.00 5-Rankin-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
4 ♠ E ♦ A 4 420 1.00 1.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Shepard-Turner
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
♠
J 6 5
♥
J 7 6 5
♦
9 3
♣
9 8 4 2
♠
A K 2
♥
A 10 9 4
♦
K 6 4
♣
A 10 7
N
W
E
S
♠
10 7
♥
K 3 2
♦
A J 10 7 5
♣
Q 5 3
2 18 10 10
♠
Q 9 8 4 3
♥
Q 8
♦
Q 8 2
♣
K J 6
E 6♥; EW 5N; W 5♥; EW 5♦; EW 3♠; EW 4♣; Par −980
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W 4 430 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
3 NT W ♥ 5 5 460 1.00 1.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 3-Shepard-Turner
3 NT E ♠ 4 6 490 0.00 2.00 5-Rankin-Havel vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
♠
9 4
♥
Q 10 9
♦
A 8
♣
K 10 7 6 4 2
♠
Q 8 7 2
♥
K 5
♦
K Q 4 2
♣
8 5 3
N
W
E
S
♠
10 6 5 3
♥
J 8 7 6 4 2
♦
10 7
♣
J
9 10 2 19
♠
A K J
♥
A 3
♦
J 9 6 5 3
♣
A Q 9
S 6♣; NS 5N; N 5♣; NS 4♦; NS 1♠; S 1♥; Par +920
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT S ♠ 2 5 460 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Havel
3 NT S ♠ 2 3 400 1.00 1.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
3 ♣ N ♥ 8 5 150 0.00 2.00 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
♠
Q 8
♥
A K J 4
♦
J 9 6 2
♣
5 4 2
♠
A K 10 2
♥
10 9
♦
K 5 4
♣
A 9 7 3
N
W
E
S
♠
7 5 4 3
♥
Q 5 3 2
♦
Q 8 7
♣
K 6
11 14 7 8
♠
J 9 6
♥
8 7 6
♦
A 10 3
♣
Q J 10 8
EW 2♠; E 1N; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par −110
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 NT W ♥ 4 1 90 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Havel
1 ♠ W ♦ 2 3 140 1.00 1.00 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
2 ♠ W ♥ A 4 170 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
♠
J 8 6 5
♥
J 8 7 2
♦
K J
♣
Q 10 8
♠
Q 10 9 3
♥
K Q 5
♦
9 8 7 6
♣
6 4
N
W
E
S
♠
A K
♥
A 10 9
♦
4 3 2
♣
A J 9 5 2
8 7 16 9
♠
7 4 2
♥
6 4 3
♦
A Q 10 5
♣
K 7 3
EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♦ E ♠ 3 2 90 1.50 0.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Havel
1 NT E ♣ 3 1 90 1.50 0.50 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
1 NT E ♦ 3 2 120 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
♠
9 7 2
♥
8 6 2
♦
Q J 10 8 7
♣
7 5
♠
A Q 6
♥
A K 7 5 3
♦
A 9 3
♣
9 6
N
W
E
S
♠
J 3
♥
Q J 9
♦
5 4 2
♣
A K Q 10 2
3 17 13 7
♠
K 10 8 5 4
♥
10 4
♦
K 6
♣
J 8 4 3
EW 6N; EW 6♥; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 3♦; Par −1440
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♦ Q 4 630 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Havel
4 ♥ W ♠ 7 7 710 1.00 1.00 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
6 NT W ♦ Q 7 1470 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
♠
Q 8
♥
A J 9 7 6 2
♦
K 8 5 3 2
♣
—
♠
K 9 7
♥
K Q 5
♦
—
♣
J 9 8 7 6 5 4
N
W
E
S
♠
A J 6 4
♥
10 8 4
♦
A Q J 9 7
♣
K
10 9 15 6
♠
10 5 3 2
♥
3
♦
10 6 4
♣
A Q 10 3 2
EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 2♣; EW 1♥; Par −120
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♦ E ♥ 3 −3 300 2.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Havel
3 ♣ W ♥ A 3 110 0.50 1.50 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal
3 ♣ W ♦ 2 3 110 0.50 1.50 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
♠
A Q 6 4
♥
Q 7 3
♦
6
♣
A Q J 8 5
♠
2
♥
K 10 6
♦
10 9 4
♣
K 10 9 7 4 2
N
W
E
S
♠
K 8 7 5
♥
A 9 8 5 2
♦
A Q J
♣
6
15 6 14 5
♠
J 10 9 3
♥
J 4
♦
K 8 7 5 3 2
♣
3
NS 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; W 2♣; E 1♣; Par +100: EW 2N×−1; W 3♣×−1; EW 3♥×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ E ♦ 5 −3 150 2.00 0.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Rankin-Havel
1 NT N ♥ 4 1 90 1.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
3 ♠ S ♥ K −2 200 0.00 2.00 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
♠
A 7 5
♥
A J 10 7 5
♦
7
♣
K 4 3 2
♠
K 8
♥
8 3
♦
K 6 5 4 3
♣
10 9 8 5
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 9 6 4
♥
K 4
♦
A Q 9 8
♣
J 7
12 6 12 10
♠
J 3 2
♥
Q 9 6 2
♦
J 10 2
♣
A Q 6
NS 3♥; EW 3♦; NS 1♣; Par +140
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ N ♣ J 4 170 1.50 0.50 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ N ♣ J 4 170 1.50 0.50 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Rankin-Havel
2 ♥ N ♣ J 3 140 0.00 2.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
♠
A K Q 8 7 5 3 2
♥
K
♦
—
♣
9 7 6 2
♠
J 10 6
♥
10 4
♦
Q 10 7 5
♣
K J 10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
—
♥
J 8 7 6 5 3
♦
8 6 4
♣
A Q 5 4
12 7 7 14
♠
9 4
♥
A Q 9 2
♦
A K J 9 3 2
♣
8
NS 6♠; NS 3N; N 3♦; EW 1♥; S 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +1430
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♠ N ♣ A 6 1430 1.50 0.50 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
6 ♠ N ♣ A 6 1430 1.50 0.50 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ N ♣ A 6 680 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Rankin-Havel
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
♠
J 9 5 4 3
♥
Q J 5 2
♦
6
♣
A 6 5
♠
A K 7
♥
A K 9 8 6
♦
Q 7
♣
J 10 3
N
W
E
S
♠
Q 10 8 6
♥
10 4 3
♦
J 9 5 3
♣
K 2
8 17 6 9
♠
2
♥
7
♦
A K 10 8 4 2
♣
Q 9 8 7 4
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −100: NS 3♣×−1; NS 3♦×−1
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ W ♠ 4 −2 100 2.00 0.00 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ W ♦ 6 −1 50 1.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
1 NT W ♠ 4 1 90 0.00 2.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Rankin-Havel
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
♠
Q 10 9 8 7 3
♥
5
♦
K 9 3
♣
10 9 8
♠
J
♥
K Q 7 6 4 3 2
♦
8 6 5
♣
J 4
N
W
E
S
♠
K 6 4 2
♥
A 9
♦
A Q 10 4
♣
Q 7 3
5 7 15 13
♠
A 5
♥
J 10 8
♦
J 7 2
♣
A K 6 5 2
EW 4♥; EW 3N; NS 2♠; EW 2♦; NS 2♣; Par −300: NS 4♠×−2
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ W ♠ 10 4 170 2.00 0.00 6-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Rankin-Havel
4 ♠× N ♦ A −3 500 1.00 1.00 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT E 3 600 0.00 2.00 1-Ciolli-Chaganlal vs 4-Lagodimos-Kitamura
Website designed and built by Kathie Angione June 2008
