
To view PREVIOUS RESULTS click --> CALENDAR
To REPLAY these hands click on the "replay hand" button and follow the directions. Have fun!
Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session February 26, 2014
Scores after 7 rounds Average: 31.5 Section E
Pair Pct Score Section Rank MPs
A B C
3 53.70 33.83 B 1 1 0.80(A) Judi Bunch - Hiroko Kitamura
5 51.32 32.33 B 2 2 0.56(A) Dave Cleary - John Dusharme
1 49.17 30.98 A 3 0.40(A) Thomas Ciolli - James Ciolli
2 48.94 30.83 C 1 0.24(C) Doral Hunter - Fran Hunter
4 47.89 30.17 C 2 0.17(C) Judy Shepard - Roy Shepard
6 35.98 22.67 C Cheryl Rankin - Carol Adair
7 35.19 22.17 C Vickie Palmer - Darrel Palmer
8 79.17 49.88 A NE Kathie Angione - John Peter Lagodimos
EW 3N; EW 5♦; NS 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 1♣; Par −400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
2 ♠ N ♥ 7 2 110 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♦ W ♠ K 5 150 2.00 1.00 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 6-Rankin-Adair
5 ♦ W ♠ K 5 400 1.00 2.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♥ E ♠ 10 4 420 0.00 3.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; EW 4♦; NS 4♣; EW 1♥; Par +100: EW 5♦×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♦× W ♠ K −2 300 2.83 0.17 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♦ W ♣ 9 5 150 0.83 2.17 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♦ W ♥ A 5 150 0.83 2.17 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 6-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 4N; EW 3♠; EW 2♦; EW 1♣; Par −650 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♥ W ♠ 7 −1 100 3.00 0.00 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 6-Rankin-Adair
620 2.00 1.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♥ W ♠ 10 5 650 0.50 2.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
4 ♥ W ♠ 10 5 650 0.50 2.50 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 2N; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par −620 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♥ W ♦ 9 3 140 2.50 0.50 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
2 ♥ W ♦ 6 3 140 2.50 0.50 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 ♥ W ♦ 9 4 170 0.50 2.50 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
2 ♥ W ♣ 4 4 170 0.50 2.50 6-Rankin-Adair vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; EW 2N; NS 2♦; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♠ W ♥ K 5 200 2.00 1.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
3 ♠ W ♥ K 5 200 2.00 1.00 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♠ W ♥ K 5 200 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ W ♥ K 5 450 0.00 3.00 6-Rankin-Adair vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 6N; N 6♠; NS 6♥; S 5♠; NS 3♣; NS 2♦; Par +990 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♦ 9 5 450 3.00 0.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
4 ♠ S ♥ Q 4 420 1.00 2.00 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♠ S ♥ Q 4 420 1.00 2.00 6-Rankin-Adair vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
4 ♠ S ♦ 9 4 420 1.00 2.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 7N; NS 7♠; NS 7♥; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; Par +2220 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
6 ♥ S ♠ Q 7 1460 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♥ S ♦ 3 7 710 1.50 1.50 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 6-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ S ♥ 3 7 710 1.50 1.50 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
6 ♥ S ♠ 8 −1 100 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
E 2♠; S 2♥; NS 3♦; NS 1N; W 1♠; N 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +100: E 3♠×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♦ S ♣ K −3 150 3.00 0.00 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
1 ♦ E ♣ K −2 100 1.50 1.50 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
3 ♣ W ♠ 3 −2 100 1.50 1.50 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
2 NT E ♠ 5 2 120 0.00 3.00 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 6-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♠; NS 4♦; NS 1N; EW 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +420 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♠ N ♣ 10 5 450 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♠ N ♣ J 4 420 1.00 2.00 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 6-Rankin-Adair
4 ♠ N ♣ J 4 420 1.00 2.00 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ N ♠ 4 4 420 1.00 2.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♠; NS 4♥; NS 5♦; EW 2♣; Par −200: NS 6♦×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♣ A 4 620 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
5 ♦ N ♠ K −1 100 2.00 1.00 6-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♠ E ♥ A 5 200 1.00 2.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
4 ♠ E ♥ A 5 650 0.00 3.00 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3♥; NS 4♣; NS 2N; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; Par +140 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
5 ♣ S ♠ 2 5 400 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
1 NT N 6 240 2.00 1.00 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♣ N ♠ 6 5 150 1.00 2.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
2 ♥ N ♦ 2 2 110 0.00 3.00 6-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5N; EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 4♦; EW 4♣; Par −460 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♣ 5 4 430 2.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
3 NT W ♣ 5 4 430 2.00 1.00 5-Cleary-Dusharme vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
3 NT W ♥ 7 4 430 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
3 NT W ♣ 7 6 490 0.00 3.00 6-Rankin-Adair vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♦; NS 1N; NS 1♠; EW 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♦ N ♣ 6 3 110 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
1 ♠ E ♦ 2 1 80 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
2 ♥ E ♦ 2 2 110 1.00 2.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
3 ♥ E ♦ 2 3 140 0.00 3.00 6-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 5♠; NS 5♥; EW 1♦; Par +450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ S ♦ A 4 420 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
3 ♠ N ♦ Q 5 200 1.50 1.50 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♠ N ♦ Q 5 200 1.50 1.50 6-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
2 ♥ S ♦ A 4 170 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 5♥; EW 4N; EW 4♠; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −450 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥ E ♠ Q 6 480 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
4 ♥ E ♠ Q 6 480 2.00 1.00 6-Rankin-Adair vs 1-Ciolli-Ciolli
4 ♥ E ♦ 10 6 480 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
4 ♥ E ♠ Q 7 510 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♠; EW 2N; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; EW 2♦; Par −100: NS 4♣×−1 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT× E ♣ 3 −1 200 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 6-Rankin-Adair
3 ♣ S ♥ A 3 110 2.00 1.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
2 NT W ♣ 3 2 120 1.00 2.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
2 ♠ W ♥ 9 3 140 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 3♦; EW 1N; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; Par −110 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 ♣× W ♦ K −1 100 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 6-Rankin-Adair
4 ♥ E ♥ 2 −1 50 2.00 1.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
1 NT S ♣ K −2 100 1.00 2.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
3 ♦ W ♠ 2 3 110 0.00 3.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
W 3N; EW 3♥; E 2N; W 3♦; EW 3♣; E 2♦; EW 1♠; Par −400 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT W ♠ 7 −4 200 3.00 0.00 3-Bunch-Kitamura vs 4-Shepard-Shepard
2 NT W ♠ 7 −3 150 2.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
2 ♥ E ♦ 7 −2 100 1.00 2.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 6-Rankin-Adair
2 ♥ E 2 110 0.00 3.00 7-Palmer-Palmer vs 2-Hunter-Hunter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 4♦; NS 4♣; EW 2♠; NS 1N; EW 1♥; Par +130 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
3 NT N ♥ 8 5 460 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
1 NT S ♠ 4 2 120 2.00 1.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♦ N ♣ 9 3 110 1.00 2.00 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
3 NT N ♥ A −1 50 0.00 3.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Rankin-Adair
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS 3N; N 4♦; NS 2♥; S 3♦; NS 1♠; EW 1♣; Par +600 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
1 ♦ E ♥ K −3 300 3.00 0.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Rankin-Adair
2 ♥ N ♠ A 4 170 2.00 1.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
2 ♥ N ♣ J 3 140 1.00 2.00 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
1 ♠ W ♣ 9 −1 100 0.00 3.00 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EW 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♣; Par −110 |
CONTRACT BY LEAD MADE SCORES MATCHPOINTS PAIRS
N-S E-W N-S E-W
4 ♥× W ♦ A −2 300 3.00 0.00 8-Angione-Lagodimos vs 7-Palmer-Palmer
3 ♦ N ♣ 2 4 130 2.00 1.00 2-Hunter-Hunter vs 6-Rankin-Adair
3 ♠ E ♦ 4 3 140 0.50 2.50 1-Ciolli-Ciolli vs 3-Bunch-Kitamura
3 ♥ W ♦ A 3 140 0.50 2.50 4-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Cleary-Dusharme
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||