| 1 |
♠985
♥Q98764
♦8
♣A43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♥7 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
50 2.00 1.00 6N W -1 ♥6 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
490 1.00 2.00 3N W +3 ♥9 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 1-Schottle-Swift
990 0.00 3.00 6N W ♠9 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 2 |
♠KQT732
♥Q9
♦Q4
♣853
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 4♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT5 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♠A 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦A 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 4-Turner-Shepard
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠A 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 1-Schottle-Swift
400 0.00 3.00 5♦ E ♠J 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 3 |
♠98765
♥A52
♦764
♣A5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥K 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 4-Turner-Shepard
90 1.50 1.50 1N E ♣2 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
90 1.50 1.50 1N E 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
120 0.00 3.00 2N E ♣2 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 4 |
♠A754
♥Q87
♦AQ53
♣K8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ S ♥A 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ N ♣A 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥3 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
100 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦5 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 5 |
♠AJT52
♥KJT7
♦8
♣T82
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♠K 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
50 1.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♣2 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Schottle-Swift
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♠K 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
90 0.00 3.00 2♣ W ♦8 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
|
| 6 |
♠QT9653
♥-
♦T6
♣K8762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2/3 ♠5 NT1/2 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1/2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2♠ N -3 ♦2 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
180 2.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♠J 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
200 0.50 2.50 3♥ W +2 ♦T 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
200 0.50 2.50 3♥ S -4 ♣A 4-Turner-Shepard vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 7 |
♠KT8753
♥83
♦Q64
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥0 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 4♣ E ♠A 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Schottle-Swift
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠7 4-Turner-Shepard vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
680 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +2 ♠7 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
1460 0.00 3.00 6♥ W +1 ♣Q 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
|
| 8 |
♠AK7
♥T96
♦Q7
♣JT653
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♠T 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Schottle-Swift
120 2.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♥3 4-Turner-Shepard vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
90 0.00 3.00 1N E ♠4 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
|
| 9 |
♠KJ4
♥KJ972
♦KJ
♣843
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♣ E ♥Q 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 1-Schottle-Swift
130 2.00 1.00 2♣ E +2 ♥Q 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
150 1.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♣8 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
600 0.00 3.00 3N E ♥Q 4-Turner-Shepard vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
|
| 10 |
♠T98642
♥AK974
♦Q6
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣1 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 5/6♣ 1♠ 5NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 6♠ W -4 ♥A 1-Schottle-Swift vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
130 2.00 1.00 3♣ E +1 ♠Q 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 4-Turner-Shepard
150 1.00 2.00 3♣ E +2 ♠Q 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
620 0.00 3.00 5♣ E +1 ♦T 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 11 |
♠K532
♥64
♦T75
♣9862
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠7 1-Schottle-Swift vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ W ♠2 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠2 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠2 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 12 |
♠JT32
♥A9
♦A6
♣98543
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♠2 5-Rankin-Cleary vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
50 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 1-Schottle-Swift vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♦A 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 13 |
♠AKJT76
♥KJ4
♦5
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♠ N ♦A 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 1-Schottle-Swift
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♣8 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Turner-Shepard
200 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +3 ♦A 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
100 0.00 3.00 7♥ S -1 ♦T 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 14 |
♠AJ97
♥K75
♦AJ7
♣Q75
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 7♦ 3♥ 3♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠4 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1020 2.50 0.50 6N N +1 ♠5 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
1020 2.50 0.50 6N N +1 ♠2 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
520 0.50 2.50 3N N +4 ♥J 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 1-Schottle-Swift
520 0.50 2.50 3N N +4 ♥J 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 15 |
♠T93
♥K7432
♦65
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 3.00 0.00 6♠ S +1 ♥6 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
710 1.50 1.50 5♠ S +2 ♥6 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 4-Turner-Shepard
710 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +3 ♥6 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♥6 6-Kitamura-Kitamura vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 16 |
♠AJ9
♥QJ2
♦AJ9
♣Q743
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♥3 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
90 2.00 1.00 1N W ♠K 1-Schottle-Swift vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ W ♠A 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
120 0.00 3.00 1N W +1 ♣3 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Shepard
|
| 17 |
♠AKQ9
♥KJ
♦QJ84
♣T95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3/2NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥7 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
150 2.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♣4 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
120 1.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♠J 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Shepard
50 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 1-Schottle-Swift vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
|
| 18 |
♠KT2
♥T874
♦K97
♣Q53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♥4 ♠5/4 NT5/4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♠2 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Turner-Shepard
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♦7 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
50 1.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 1-Schottle-Swift vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♥4 7-Dusharme-Dusharme vs 2-Lagodimos-Zaman
|
| 19 |
♠T43
♥Q32
♦Q7
♣AJ987
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 6♥ E -2 ♣Q 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
200 2.00 1.00 1♥ E +4 ♠5 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣Q 1-Schottle-Swift vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
|
| 20 |
♠AKJT9854
♥A7
♦7
♣J2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♥4 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 ♥4 1-Schottle-Swift vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ N +2 ♥4 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
|
| 21 |
♠J83
♥AT9
♦KQ952
♣A4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4/5NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3/2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♠T 2-Lagodimos-Zaman vs 6-Kitamura-Kitamura
630 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♥2 8-Palmer-Woodford vs 7-Dusharme-Dusharme
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠T 1-Schottle-Swift vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
600 0.00 3.00 3N N ♦7 4-Turner-Shepard vs 5-Rankin-Cleary
|