| 1 |
♠AK6532
♥876
♦KQ
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ N -1 ♥2 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♠Q 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
420 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♠Q 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
|
| 2 |
♠975
♥98
♦T752
♣A876
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♣6 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 ♦2 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
120 0.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♦2 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 3 |
♠JT42
♥T7532
♦Q9
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ -/1♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6/7 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠8 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
400 1.00 1.00 5♣ S ♠K 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
170 0.00 2.00 4♣ S +2 ♥A 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 4 |
♠K32
♥Q6
♦AK
♣Q86543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1/2NT ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ -/1♠ ♦4 ♠6/7 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♥A 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ S ♥A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♣3 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 5 |
♠K54
♥AQJT6
♦QT54
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1/2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N S ♠8 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♥A 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠6 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 6 |
♠Q
♥T43
♦AT94
♣A9542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 4♦ S ♥A 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
120 1.00 1.00 1N N +1 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
90 0.00 2.00 1N N ♥5 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 7 |
♠K2
♥KJ942
♦AKJ
♣JT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 7♦ 7♥ 7♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♣7 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♣2 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
200 0.00 2.00 3♠ S +2 ♣A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 8 |
♠K6
♥AJ2
♦632
♣AJT53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N N ♦T 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
150 0.50 1.50 3N S -3 ♠2 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
150 0.50 1.50 3N N -3 ♦T 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 9 |
♠J8
♥Q53
♦KJT863
♣97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5/6 ♠5/4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♦* W -1 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♠3 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 10 |
♠964
♥QT
♦Q932
♣KJT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♣J 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♠8 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
100 0.50 1.50 2♦ W -1 ♣T 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
|
| 11 |
♠A953
♥942
♦J53
♣A32
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N S 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
150 1.00 1.00 3N N -3 ♣K 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
200 0.00 2.00 3N N -4 ♠Q 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 12 |
♠QJ8
♥Q4
♦T9743
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥4/2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Kitamura-Zaman vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♦A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 3-Hunter-Hunter
|
| 13 |
♠T2
♥QT95
♦T98
♣T843
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 6/5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 6♥ W -1 ♠T 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
100 1.50 0.50 6♥ W -1 ♦T 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
630 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♠5 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
|
| 14 |
♠KJT
♥J32
♦QJ95
♣AT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N E -3 ♠6 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
140 1.00 1.00 1♥ S +2 ♣J 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
50 0.00 2.00 1♠ E -1 ♣4 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
|
| 15 |
♠AK7652
♥95
♦KT52
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣0 ♥3 NT3 |
| EW: 6♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♣ W +1 ♠A 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
170 1.00 1.00 4♣ W +2 ♠A 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
400 0.00 2.00 5♣ W ♠A 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 16 |
♠Q632
♥Q62
♦T87
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣3/4 ♦2/3 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♥Q 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Shepard-Shepard
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ W ♥2 2-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♥2 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 17 |
♠K6
♥A74
♦QJT632
♣J2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦8 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
460 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♠9 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
460 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♠3 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 18 |
♠8754
♥8753
♦K
♣A862
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣3 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ E ♣K 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠4 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
|
| 19 |
♠JT3
♥A952
♦J87
♣A32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦1 ♠6 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♣K 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
630 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠3 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
660 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠3 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 20 |
♠A4
♥JT97
♦J4
♣KJ963
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1/2♥ 1/2NT ♠6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠6 6-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Kitamura-Zaman
150 1.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♥5 3-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Angione
120 0.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♣T 1-Shepard-Shepard vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|