| 1 |
♠A
♥AJ83
♦AJ94
♣AT53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
400 1.00 1.00 3N S ♦3 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
430 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥2 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
|
| 2 |
♠AJ954
♥K
♦AQ9
♣T875
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥2 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♣2 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 3 |
♠AK72
♥K2
♦9872
♣874
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣3 ♥4/3 ♠6/5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♠K 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
200 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♣8 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W ♠A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 4 |
♠Q874
♥T4
♦T63
♣T542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6/5 ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦2 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♦2 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
100 0.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 ♥A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 5 |
♠A5
♥KJ65
♦AQ862
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
| EW: 1/2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠2 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 2.00 0.00 4♠ S +3 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
300 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -3 ♣Q 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
|
| 6 |
♠A94
♥-
♦AT95
♣QJT962
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/2♦ 2♥ 2/-♠ 2NT ♠8/6 |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N N -2 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
150 0.50 1.50 3N N -3 ♠J 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
150 0.50 1.50 4♦ W +1 ♠8 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
|
| 7 |
♠A5
♥AJT
♦KJ975
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♣6 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
100 1.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♥8 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
200 0.00 2.00 2♦ N -2 ♥8 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
|
| 8 |
♠KT2
♥AJ
♦T9
♣AT9743
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 2♠ 5NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥4 4-Bunch-Kitamura vs 3-Shepard-Turner
400 1.00 1.00 3N S ♦3 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 ♠4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
|
| 9 |
♠QT
♥KJT
♦A6
♣AKJ962
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6/5♣ 4♦ 6/5♥ 1♠ 6/3NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♠5 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Shepard-Turner
170 1.00 1.00 3♣ N +3 ♦Q 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
150 0.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 ♠5 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 10 |
♠A642
♥KJ93
♦JT76
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠3 |
| EW: 3/2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 2.00 0.00 4♥* S +1 ♥5 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Shepard-Turner
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ W ♦9 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
850 0.00 2.00 5♠* W ♣8 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 11 |
♠AK875
♥3
♦AQT4
♣A73
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 2.00 0.00 3♠* N +2 ♣3 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Shepard-Turner
590 1.00 1.00 4♠* N ♣9 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
120 0.00 2.00 2N N ♠4 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 12 |
♠AJ9
♥A976
♦J62
♣J74
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 1/-♥ 2/1♠ 2NT ♦7/6 ♥7/6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N N ♠2 5-Zaman-Kitamura vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
100 1.00 1.00 3♦ W -2 ♣4 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
50 0.00 2.00 1♠ E -1 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Shepard-Turner
|
| 13 |
♠K763
♥873
♦-
♣AQJ863
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
380 2.00 0.00 2♣* N +1 ♠J 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
300 1.00 1.00 2N E -3 ♣K 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ S ♣4 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
|
| 14 |
♠T65
♥A98
♦4
♣QJ8652
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦A 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣9 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
|
| 15 |
♠762
♥QJ9
♦852
♣A876
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 0.00 3N W +1 ♥Q 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
460 1.00 1.00 3N E +2 ♦3 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
490 0.00 2.00 3N W +3 ♥T 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 16 |
♠KT732
♥AK82
♦K
♣Q76
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/2♦ 3♥ 6♠ 4/2NT ♣6/5 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 1.00 1.00 5♠ N +1 ♣A 3-Shepard-Turner vs 1-Lagodimos-Angione
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♣K 2-Rankin-Cogdill vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
|
| 17 |
♠QJ
♥875
♦KQ86
♣8632
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ W ♦K 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
170 0.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♦A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
170 0.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♣T 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 18 |
♠Q72
♥Q642
♦93
♣QT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♥5 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
50 1.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥6 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♣6 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
|
| 19 |
♠KQ
♥AJ654
♦AK72
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6/5 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♥2 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
150 1.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♦6 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
80 0.00 2.00 1♥ N ♣K 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
|
| 20 |
♠A
♥-
♦KQ7632
♣AK7532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 6♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1370 2.00 0.00 6♣ N 1-Lagodimos-Angione vs 4-Bunch-Kitamura
690 1.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♦4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Zaman-Kitamura
620 0.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 ♠8 3-Shepard-Turner vs 2-Rankin-Cogdill
|