Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠K764
♥972
♦AQJ4
♣54
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♦Q 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♦J 1-Cogdill-Main vs 1-Schottle-Swift
100 2.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♣5 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
80 0.00 3.00 1♠ S ♦7 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
|
| 2 |
♠KT987
♥7
♦652
♣KT73
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3/4♠ 2/3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♦8 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦3 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
200 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 ♥K 1-Cogdill-Main vs 1-Schottle-Swift
200 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -2 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
|
| 3 |
♠J8543
♥53
♦642
♣654
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 5/4♣ 5/4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ N -2 ♣K 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 2.00 1.00 1♥ S -2 ♦T 1-Cogdill-Main vs 1-Schottle-Swift
100 2.00 1.00 1♥ S -2 ♣8 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
150 0.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♠3 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
|
| 4 |
♠K53
♥93
♦Q62
♣KJT83
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♥Q 3-Crail-Huffman vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
300 2.00 1.00 2♥ W -3 ♦2 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♣J 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 1-Schottle-Swift
200 0.00 3.00 2N N -2 ♦4 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 5 |
♠Q976
♥T82
♦AJT75
♣4
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 1.50 3N W -2 ♠6 3-Crail-Huffman vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
100 1.50 1.50 3N W -2 ♠5 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ W -2 ♣4 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ W -2 ♣4 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 6 |
♠J9432
♥43
♦QJT8
♣J2
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1/2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1/-♠ 3NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 2♣ W +2 ♠3 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 1-Schottle-Swift
150 1.50 1.50 2♣ W +3 ♠3 3-Crail-Huffman vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
150 1.50 1.50 1♣ W +4 ♦Q 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
180 0.00 3.00 1N E +3 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
|
| 7 |
♠J8754
♥Q
♦A92
♣K842
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ S ♣5 3-Crail-Huffman vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 1.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♣Q 1-Cogdill-Main vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
100 1.50 1.50 3N N -1 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♣Q 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 8 |
♠AQ84
♥632
♦K9
♣QJ82
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♣3 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
230 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +4 ♥A 1-Cogdill-Main vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ S ♣3 3-Crail-Huffman vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♣Q 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 9 |
♠T4
♥A84
♦AKJT32
♣65
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♣ E -3 ♦4 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 1-Schottle-Swift
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ N +1 ♣A 1-Cogdill-Main vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S ♣2 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
90 0.00 3.00 2♦ N ♣A 3-Crail-Huffman vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
|
| 10 |
♠AT864
♥J64
♦K
♣A653
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ ♥3/2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠Q 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♦3 1-Cogdill-Main vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 1-Schottle-Swift
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♣4 3-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 11 |
♠AKQ97
♥K
♦62
♣T7653
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ W 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 1-Schottle-Swift
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠A 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♠A 1-Cogdill-Main vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
450 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♠A 3-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 12 |
♠KJ
♥KT4
♦J754
♣9854
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♣ E +1 ♥2 5-Lagodimos-Havel vs 1-Schottle-Swift
120 2.00 1.00 2N E ♦3 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
130 1.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 ♥A 3-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
150 0.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♦6 1-Cogdill-Main vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
|
| 13 |
♠96
♥AJT5
♦KJ2
♣Q943
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠5 1-Cogdill-Main vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♣3 3-Crail-Huffman vs 1-Schottle-Swift
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♠2 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♦4 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
|
| 14 |
♠JT52
♥KQ2
♦J9432
♣K
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N W +1 ♦3 1-Cogdill-Main vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
150 2.00 1.00 2♣ E +3 ♦A 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
170 0.50 2.50 3♣ E +3 ♦A 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
170 0.50 2.50 3♣ E +3 ♦Q 3-Crail-Huffman vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|
| 15 |
♠T986
♥KT87
♦KQ3
♣72
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5/6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♥
♣7/6 ♦6 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -3 ♣2 4-Bucknell-Eklund vs 3-Kukuk-Wolf
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♦J 1-Cogdill-Main vs 2-Palmer-Palmer
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♦J 2-Cleary-Eaton vs 4-Hurley-Osgood
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥2 3-Crail-Huffman vs 1-Schottle-Swift
|