Hands and Results
| 1 |
♠Q84
♥J9763
♦A983
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3/1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N S ♣A 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Crail-Huffman
120 1.00 1.00 2N S ♣A 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 2 |
♠95
♥K9763
♦T43
♣AK5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 ♥J 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
90 1.00 1.00 1N S ♠8 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
200 0.00 2.00 1N S -2 ♦5 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Crail-Huffman
|
| 3 |
♠J8642
♥T9743
♦-
♣842
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1/2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦A 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
150 1.00 1.00 1♦ S -3 ♠Q 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
600 0.00 2.00 3N E ♥2 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Crail-Huffman
|
| 4 |
♠AJ754
♥KJ8
♦93
♣T85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
130 1.00 1.00 4♦ W ♠A 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
150 0.00 2.00 4♦ W +1 ♠A 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 3-Crail-Huffman
|
| 5 |
♠A4
♥QT74
♦K763
♣875
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♥3 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E ♣K 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Crail-Huffman
140 0.00 2.00 1♠ E +2 ♦A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
|
| 6 |
♠KQJ832
♥J
♦T84
♣K53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 ♥4 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣5/6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♣2 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♦7 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Crail-Huffman
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
|
| 7 |
♠J983
♥A
♦T752
♣8732
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥K 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Crail-Huffman
90 1.00 1.00 1N W ♣8 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠K 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
|
| 8 |
♠AK76
♥A2
♦AK875
♣J3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 6♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣4 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
430 1.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♣4 4-Parikh-Parikh vs 3-Crail-Huffman
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ S 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 9 |
♠-
♥J96532
♦KJ53
♣AK8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 4♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣0 ♦6 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
940 2.00 0.00 6♣ S +1 ♦T 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
920 1.00 1.00 6♣ S ♠6 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Crail-Huffman
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦4 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 10 |
♠KJ732
♥J97
♦8
♣AK98
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♦ 3NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♦2 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Crail-Huffman
100 1.00 1.00 5♦ E -1 ♥K 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
710 0.00 2.00 4♦* E 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 11 |
♠J5
♥KT7632
♦2
♣QT64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♣ W -1 ♠J 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Crail-Huffman
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♠A 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
470 0.00 2.00 3♣* W ♠J 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 12 |
♠AK653
♥Q65
♦Q97
♣J4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
110 1.00 1.00 2♥ N ♠T 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
100 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠7 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 3-Crail-Huffman
|
| 13 |
♠AKQ
♥2
♦KQT
♣AJT976
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♥ -/1♠ -/1NT ♣3 ♦3/4 ♠6/7 NT4/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♥* W -1 ♠A 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
110 0.50 1.50 3♣ N ♥A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
110 0.50 1.50 2♣ N +1 ♥A 3-Crail-Huffman vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 14 |
♠KQJT9
♥KJT
♦965
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -3 ♣A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
130 1.00 1.00 3♣ S +1 ♥4 3-Crail-Huffman vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
90 0.00 2.00 1N S 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 15 |
♠QJ42
♥J42
♦Q7
♣Q974
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥9 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
130 0.50 1.50 2♦ W +2 ♥2 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
130 0.50 1.50 2♦ W +2 ♣4 3-Crail-Huffman vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
|
| 16 |
♠Q7
♥KQ865
♦AT76
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 4♠ -/1NT ♦6 NT6/7 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦K 3-Crail-Huffman vs 1-Palmer-Palmer
170 1.00 1.00 1♠ S +3 ♣J 2-Lagodimos-Dodson vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ S ♣J 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
|
| 17 |
♠932
♥J83
♦6
♣T87532
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 4/3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3/1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 2.00 0.00 2♦ E +2 ♠5 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
130 0.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♥A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
130 0.50 1.50 2♦ E +2 ♠Q 3-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
|
| 18 |
♠AJ93
♥T54
♦T
♣AQ532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 2.00 0.00 3♠* N ♥2 3-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
110 1.00 1.00 2♦ S +1 ♥A 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
100 0.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♥A 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 19 |
♠AKJT932
♥-
♦AQJ87
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 7♦ 1♥ 7♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 2.00 0.00 6♠ N +1 ♥K 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
510 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +3 ♥K 3-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
510 0.50 1.50 4♠ N +3 ♥K 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
|
| 20 |
♠9862
♥J63
♦T82
♣752
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4/5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 1.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♠9 6-Hunter-Hunter vs 5-Piazzoni-Piazzoni
660 1.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♠8 1-Palmer-Palmer vs 4-Parikh-Parikh
660 1.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♠2 3-Crail-Huffman vs 2-Lagodimos-Dodson
|